Proving Geodesic Length Unchanged by Small Curve Changes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the proper length of a geodesic between two points remains unchanged to first order despite small variations in the curve, as long as the endpoints are fixed. The key equation utilized is the length of the curve, represented as an integral involving the metric tensor \( g_{\alpha\beta} \) and the derivative of the curve \( \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda} \). The participants concluded that the change in length \( \Delta l \) can be expressed in terms of the geodesic equation, ultimately demonstrating that the first-order variation vanishes when the appropriate terms are accounted for.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry and geodesics
  • Familiarity with metric tensors and their properties
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration and differentiation
  • Experience with Taylor expansions and perturbation methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geodesic equation in differential geometry
  • Learn about the properties of metric tensors in various coordinate systems
  • Explore Taylor series expansions and their applications in physics
  • Investigate perturbation theory in the context of general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, differential geometry, and the study of geodesics.

Mmmm
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the proper length of geodesic between two points is unchanged to first order by small changes in the curve that do not change its endpoints.

Homework Equations



Length of curve = \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|^\frac{1}{2}d\lambda

where g_{\alpha\beta} is the metric for the particular coordinate system, and
\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}= U^\alpha is the gradient of the curve.

On a geodesic, g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda} is constant.


The Attempt at a Solution



The equation of the curve is
x^\alpha = x^\alpha(\lambda)

For a small change in the curve, the equation becomes
x^\alpha = x^\alpha(\lambda) + \delta x^\alpha(\lambda)
where
\delta x^\alpha(\lambda_{2})=\delta x^\alpha(\lambda_{1}) = 0
to ensure that the ends of the curve are unchanged.

So

Length of curve = \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d}{d\lambda}(x^\alpha + \delta x^\alpha)\frac{d}{d\lambda}(x^\alpha + \delta x^\alpha)\right|^\frac{1}{2}d\lambda

Multiplying out:
=\int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|^\frac{1}{2}d\lambda

Expanding to first order:

\approx \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|^\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|^\frac{-1}{2} \left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

The first term here is the length of the original curve again so the second term is the change in length to first order given a small change in the curve. I must prove that this is 0.

\Delta l = \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|^\frac{-1}{2} \left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

Now on a geodesic g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda} is constant, so i will just call this factor C.

so
\Delta l = C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\beta}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

Rename some indices to get a common factor of \frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}:

= C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}+g_{\gamma\beta}\frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

Factorise and rename more indices:

= C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|\frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}\right|\left|g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d x^\alpha}{d\lambda}+g_{\gamma\alpha}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

use symmetry of g to make first two terms equal:

= C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|\frac{d\delta x^\gamma}{d\lambda}\right|\left| 2 g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d x^\alpha}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\right|d\lambda

Now integrate by parts:

= C \left[ \frac{1}{2}\left|{\delta x^\gamma}\left( 2 g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d x^\alpha}{d\lambda}+g_{\alpha\gamma}\frac{d\delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda}\right) \right| \right] ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}} - C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}}\frac{1}{2}\left|\delta x^\gamma}\left( 2 \frac{d}{d \lambda} \left( g_{\alpha\gamma} U^\alpha \right) + \frac{d}{d \lambda} \left( g_{\alpha\gamma} \frac{d \delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda} \right) \right)\right|d\lambda

The first term vanishes as \delta x^\alpha(\lambda_{2})=\delta x^\alpha(\lambda_{1}) = 0

= C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}} \left|\delta x^\gamma}\left[ - \frac{d}{d \lambda} \left( g_{\alpha\gamma} U^\alpha \right) - \frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{d \lambda} \left( g_{\alpha\gamma} \frac{d \delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda} \right) \right]\right|d\lambda

This is where I get a bit stuck. The expression in square brackets should come out as the geodesic equation and it is nearly there. The problem is the second term, it should be

\frac{1}{2}g_{\alpha \beta , \gamma} U^\alpha U^\beta

(which I got from the answer in the back of the book)
to give

\Delta l = C \int ^{\lambda_{2}}_{\lambda_{1}} \left|\delta x^\gamma}\left[ - \frac{d}{d \lambda} \left( g_{\alpha\gamma} U^\alpha \right) + \frac{1}{2}g_{\alpha \beta , \gamma} U^\alpha U^\beta \right]\right|d\lambda

Then, indeed with a bit of indices tweaking you do get the geodesic equation and everything vanishes.

I have an extra \frac{d \delta x^\alpha}{d\lambda} and I just have no idea how to get rid of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's easy to get rid of. It gets rid of itself when the variation goes to zero. It shouldn't have been there to begin with. It came from a term that's second order in the variation. You should have thrown that away at the beginning. The term you are missing comes from the variation of the g, g(x(\lambda)+\delta x(\lambda)).
 


Aaaaahhhhhhh... of course. after a taylor expansion of g right at the beginning and a removal of that 2nd order term it all comes out beautifully.

Thanks so much Dick... Now I can sleep at night ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K