Proving Isomorphism of Skew-Symmetric Matrices to 3D Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dollydaggerxo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the isomorphism between skew-symmetric matrices and 3D vectors, specifically in the context of the cross product operation. The original poster seeks guidance on how to approach this proof and the representation of skew-symmetric matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the representation of skew-symmetric matrices and their relationship to 3D vectors. Questions are raised about the nature of the operation involved and how to express these matrices as linear combinations of basis vectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into expressing skew-symmetric matrices in terms of basis matrices, which may help clarify the original poster's understanding. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of the operation defining the Lie Bracket in this context, suggesting a productive direction for the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the proof process and the representation of vectors, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts. There is a mention of constructed multiplication tables, but details are not fully elaborated.

Dollydaggerxo
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I have been asked to prove that three different matrices which are skew-symmetric with a defined operation can be shown to be isomorphic to the usual vectors in 3d space with the operation of the cross product.

Homework Equations



Well the operation i guess is not so important to state as I have constructed a multiplication table for it but it is X*Y = XY-YX.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the cross product for a x b would be a2b3 - a3b2 etc etc and i can see in my head why it is isomorphic I just really do not know how to go about proving it. what should be vectors be, should they all be the same at just i,j,k? i don't know how to prove it without using numbers as the vectors.
please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


also how can i write a skew-symmetric matrix as a linear combination of I J and K?
please help thanks
 


If, by "I, J, and K" you mean the 3-d basis vectors, you can't- matrices are not vectors. But you can write such a matrix as a linear combination of three basis matrices that the isomorphism maps into [itex]\vec{i}[/itex], [itex]\vec{j}[/itex], and [itex]\vec{k}[/itex].

Any 3 by 3 skew-symmetric matrix is of the form
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}0 & a & b \\ -a & 0 & c \\ -b & -c & 0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
[tex]= a\begin{bmatrix}0 & 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}+ b\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}+ c\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & -1 & 0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
 


thanks so muchhh i think i know what I am doing now! can't believe never knew that way of writing skew-symmetric matrices
 


actually, that operation IS important, it is the typical way of defining a Lie Bracket on a matrix algebra:

[X,Y] = XY - YX

by identifying R^3 with a certain subset of the matrix algebra, you have shown that the cross product can be used to identify R^3 as a subalgebra of the Lie Algebra M3(R).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K