Proving Limit of Exponential Function is Zero

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the limit of a specific exponential function approaches zero as n approaches infinity. The user has applied L'Hôpital's rule and is trying to understand how the derivative of a function, ψ(n), which converges to zero, behaves in this limit. Clarifications reveal that ψ(n) is not a wave function but is relevant to a statistics class. Another user provides insight into the exponential convergence principle, confirming that the limit can be simplified to e^(bc) as n approaches infinity. The conversation highlights the challenges of manipulating limits and derivatives in mathematical proofs.
happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm working on this:
Given that \lim_{n \to \infty} \psi(n)=0 and that b and c do not depend upon n, prove that:
\lim_{n\to \infty}\left[ 1+\frac{b}{n} +\frac{\psi(n)}{n}\right]^{cn} = \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+\frac{b}{n}\right)^{cn}=e^{bc}
So far, I've taken the natural log of both sides, moved the cn into the bottom and applied L'hopitals rule. I get:
\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{n} +\frac{\psi(n)}{n}}\left(\frac{-b}{n^2} + \frac{\psi'(n)}{n}-\frac{\psi(n)}{n^2}\right)}} {\frac{-1}{c n^2}}}=\lim_{n\to \infty}bc
which breaks down to:
\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{n}+\frac{\psi(n)}{n}}\left(-cn\psi'(n)-c\psi(n)+bc)\right)
If the limit of a function goes to zero, how do we prove that it's derivative goes to zero?
I'm not sure where to go now, because I don't know what to do with \psi'(n) how can I prove that it's zero? If it IS zero, then the whole thing falls out nicely.
Thanks,
CC
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is some problem with your LaTeX.

Is psi a wave function by any chance?
 
yea, I tried to fix the latex a little bit. For some reason, it's not centering my fraction on the bottom.That whole mess is over \frac{-1}{c^2 n^2}. No, the \psi(n) isn't a wave function. This is for a statistics class. I think the only thing I'm supposed to worry about is that it goes to 0 as n goes to infinity. I also forrgot my limit in front of my giant fraction. I will try and fix it.
CC
 
There. It's a little better. I hope you can tell what I mean. I can't figure out why the bottom fraction is way over on the left like that. That WHOLE thing on the left equals \lim_{n\to\infty}bc...which is just bc...anyway, any pointers will be appreciated. I am stuck stuck stuck.
CC
 
Well I know this post is 3 years old so you likely no longer need the answer but who knows, maybe someone will make some use of it.

I will try and type it with LaTeX code but I am not positive it will show as intended as this is my first use of these forums.

The basic principle used here will be the well known exponential convergence which is

\lim_{n \to \infty} (1 + \frac{x}{n})^{n} = e^{x}

Now looking at your problem. Since c is independant from n, we have

\lim_{n\to \infty}\left[ 1+\frac{b}{n} +\frac{\psi(n)}{n}\right]^{cn} & = & {\left[ \lim_{n\to \infty}\left[ 1+\frac{b}{n} +\frac{\psi(n)}{n}\right]^{n} \right]}^{c}
= {\left[ \lim_{n\to \infty}\left[ 1+\frac{b+\psi(n)}{n}\right]^{n} \right]}^{c}
= {\left[ \lim_{n\to \infty} e^{b+\psi(n)} \right]}^{c}
= {\left[ e^{b} \times \lim_{n\to \infty} e^{\psi(n)} \right]}^{c}
= {\left[ e^{b}\times e^{0} \right]}^{c}
= e^{bc}



Vincent
Graduate math student
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K