Proving Non-Empty Finite Sets with Induction: A Challenge

SahDu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys. I need some help solving this proof using induction:

Prove that for all non-empty finite sets A and B, there are |B|^|A| functions from A to B

(where |B| and |A| obviously represents the cardinality of B and A respectively.)

Thanks in advance for the help, since I am pretty stuck. Thanks again!

Jeff

EDIT: Sorry, to reiterate...these are the practice problems we were told to look at before the test...so it's not HW.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
But you still have to demonstrate that you've tried solving this problem!
 
Oh haha! Sorry. Here is what I got and then got stuck:

b. Proof: For all non-empty finite sets A and B, there are |B||A| functions from A to B.
Assume for all non empty finite sets, for any proper subset Z C A and Y C B, we have |Y||Z| functions from Z to Y
Let z be an arbitrary element of A, let y be an arbitrary element of B, let Z=A\{z} and let Y=B\{y}
Therefore, we have functions from Z to {y}, Z to Y, {z} to {y} and {z} to Y


I thought I could use induction to say it = 1+|Y|^|Z|+1+|Y|...but I couldn't get that to boil down to |B|^|A|

Jeff
 
Look at it non-rigorously. For each element of A, there are |B| places to send it. That's |B|^|A| functions.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top