Proving Onto-ness of a Continuous Function Using the Inverse Function Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter sin123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
sin123
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a continuously differentiable function f: R -> R with |f'(x)| <= c < 1 for all x in R. Define a second function F: R^2 \rightarrow R^2 by

F(x,y) = (x + f(y), y + f(x)).

F is supposed to be onto. Why is that so?

Intuitively, I would say that F is locally onto by the Inverse Function Theorem (since det(DF) = 1 - c^2 > 0). And globally the identity portion of F dominates over the little perturbation from f, so I would expect the function to be onto. But that's far away from a proof. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given (a,b) we want to solve x+f(y) = a, y+f(x) = b . This suggests a "fixed point" problem in the plane, and the derivative hypothesis should show it is contractive.
 
Got it. Thanks!
 
Back
Top