Proving Orthonormality & Boundedness of Vector Sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the orthonormality and boundedness of a vector sequence within the context of functional analysis. An orthonormal system is defined by the conditions that the inner product of distinct vectors equals zero and that each vector has a norm of one. Additionally, a sequence is considered bounded if it is contained in the space l^{\infty}. The participants reference Theorem 9.3 to clarify the notation and application of inner products in their proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inner product spaces and orthonormal systems
  • Familiarity with the concept of bounded sequences in l^{\infty}
  • Knowledge of Theorem 9.3 in functional analysis
  • Basic proficiency in vector notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner product spaces in detail
  • Review Theorem 9.3 and its applications in functional analysis
  • Explore the implications of bounded sequences in l^{\infty}
  • Practice problems on proving orthonormality of vector sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those studying functional analysis, linear algebra, or vector spaces, will benefit from this discussion.

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/5042/48390466ny3.png

Homework Equations



A orthonormal system is if [tex]f_i \cdot f_j = 0[/tex] for all [tex]i \neq j[/tex] and if [tex]||f_i||=1[/tex]

A sequence contained in [tex]l^{\infty}[/tex] is a bounded sequence.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/1840/67874379ps9.png

The Attempt at a Solution



My guess is that I have to use theorem 9.3 but I don't understand the notation. <x,e_n> is x just a number?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, [itex]<x, e_n>[/itex] is just a number and so [itex]<x, e_n>\lambda_n[/itex], for each n, is just a number. Apply your theorem 9.3 with the [itex]\lambda_n[/itex] in that theorem equal to the [itex]<x, e_n>\lambda_n[/itex] here.
 
dirk_mec1 said:
My guess is that I have to use theorem 9.3 but I don't understand the notation. <x,e_n> is x just a number?

Hi dirk_mec1! :smile:

I haven't read the whole problem,

but just answering the last sentence:

x is a vector, just like e_n, and the inner product, <x,e_n> , is a number. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K