(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

This is a homework question for a introductory course in analysis. given that

a) the partial sums of [itex]f_n[/itex] are uniformly bounded,

b) [itex] g_1 \geq g_2 \geq ... \geq 0, [/itex]

c) [itex] g_n \rightarrow 0 [/itex] uniformly,

prove that [itex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n g_n [/itex] converges uniformly (the whole adventure takes place on some interval E in R).

2. Relevant equations

Suppose [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] are two sequences. Then,

[itex] \sum_{j=m+1}^{n} x_jy_j = s_ny_{n+1} - s_my_{m+1} + \sum_{j=m+1}^{n} s_j(y_j - y_{j+1}). [/itex]

This is calledpartial summation, and is given as a hint with the exercise.

3. The attempt at a solution

Inspired by the Cauchy-criterion for uniform convergence of series of functions, I did the following.

[itex] | \sum_{j=m+1}^{n} f_n g_n | = | (\sum_{i=1}^{n}) f_i g_{n+1} - (\sum_{i=1}^{m} f_i) g_{m+1} + \sum_{j=m+1}^{n} (\sum_{i=1}^{j} f_i) (g_j - g_{j_1} ) | [/itex]

[itex] \leq |g_{n+1} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i| + |g_{m+1} \sum_1^m f_i | + | \sum_{j=m+1}^{n} (\sum_{i=1}^{j} f_i) (g_j - g_{j_1} ) |[/itex]

(the last step owing to the subadditivity of the modulus).

The first two terms can be made small since the partial sums of [itex]f[/itex] are bounded and g goes to zero, leaving the third term. I'm having trouble doing anything interesting with that though. Am I on the right track?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Product of two sequences of functions [uniform convergence]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**