Proving partial fraction decomposition? integral maybe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving partial fraction decomposition for the expression \(\frac{x^2-5x+1}{(x+3)^2x}\). The user successfully decomposes the expression into partial fractions and verifies the identity by integrating both sides, yielding the same result. The method involves multiplying both sides by the denominator and substituting values to create simultaneous equations for the coefficients. The final expression confirms the correctness of the decomposition, demonstrating the validity of the identity for all values of \(x\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial fraction decomposition
  • Knowledge of rational expressions and identities
  • Ability to perform integration of algebraic functions
  • Familiarity with solving simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of partial fraction decomposition in detail
  • Learn how to integrate rational functions using substitution
  • Explore the concept of identities in algebraic expressions
  • Practice solving simultaneous equations with multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and algebraic manipulation, as well as educators teaching partial fraction decomposition methods.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
hello everyone. I'm confused on what he wants here.
here are the directions:
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/9692/lastscan2ju.jpg

How do you prove such a thing? do i take the integral of the decompoisition and add them together or what? The homework and webworks never asked this type of question. It just was pratice on finding the decompoisition, but he has already given us that. Any help would be great!

I took the integral of the decompisition, the stuff on the right side of the equation and got:
8*ln(x-3)/9 + ln(x)/9 + 5/(3*(x-3))
and if i take the integral of the left hand side, it comes out to the same thing. is that all he wanted?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{x^2-5x+1}{(x+3)^2x}=\frac{-5}{3(x-3)^2}+\frac{8}{9(x-3)}+\frac{1}{9x}

When doing partial fractions, all you do is write the lhs above as,

\frac{x^2-5x+1}{(x+3)^2x}=\frac{Ax+B}{(x-3)^2}+\frac{C}{(x-3)}+\frac{D}{x}

What you have is an identity, which means it is true for all values of x. So you can solve for A,B and C by putting in three different values of x to get three simultaneous eqns in A, B and C.

The preferred method of doing this is to multiply both sides by the denominator on the lhs. This will give you,

x^2-5x+1 = (Ax+B)x+C(x-3)x + D(x-3)^2

Now plug in x = 3 and x = 0, which are the zeros of the factors in the denominator of the (original) lhs.
You will still need to plug in some other value of x to get your third simultaneous eqn.

When dealing with factors on the bottom which are raised to some power, you do it like this,

\frac{1}{(x-c)^3} = \frac{(Ax^2 + Bx + c)}{(x-c)^3}+\frac{Dx+E}{(x-c)^2}+\frac{F}{(x-c)}

The term on the top should always be one power of x less than the term on the bottom.

Thus is your rational expression decomposed into partial fractions.

Doing this is the "proof" asked for.
 
One perfectly good method would be to do the addition indicated on the right: To add
\frac{-5}{3(x-3)^2}+\frac{8}{9(x-3)}+\frac{1}{9x}
you need a common denominator of 9x(x-3)2. Multiply the numerator and denominator of the first fraction by 3x, the second fraction by x(x-3), and the third fraction by (x-3)2 to get
\frac{-5(3x)}{9x(x-3)^2}+ \frac{8x(x-3)}{9x(x-3)^2}+ \frac{(x-3)^2}{9x(x-3)^2}
= \frac{-15x+ 8x^2- 24x+ x^2-6x+4}{9x(x-3)^2}
= \frac{9x^2- 45x+ 9}{9x(x-3)^2}
= \frac{9(x^2- 5x+ 1)}{9x(x-3)^2}
= \frac{x^2- 5x+ 1}{x(x-3)^2}
 
thanks guys for the help! that makes sense!
:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K