Proving Polynomial Proofs: Using the Expansion Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Proofs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of polynomials, specifically that if a polynomial \( f(x) \) has a root at \( a \), then \( (x-a) \) is a factor of \( f(x) \). Participants are exploring the implications of this property using the expansion method and the polynomial \( p(x) = f(x+a) \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between the roots of polynomials and their factors. They discuss how expanding \( p(x) \) can help demonstrate that \( x \) is a factor of \( p(x) \), given that \( f(a) = 0 \). Questions arise about how to manipulate the expanded form of \( p(x) \) to show this relationship.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the connections between \( f(x) \), \( p(x) \), and the factorization of polynomials. Some guidance has been offered regarding the significance of proving that \( x \) is a factor of \( p(x) \) as a means to establish the original claim about \( f(x) \).

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that \( f(a) = 0 \) and are exploring how this relates to the factorization of polynomials. There is an emphasis on the need to understand the implications of polynomial expansion and factorization without providing a complete solution.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
If [tex]n \geq 1[/tex] and [tex]f(a) = 0[/tex] for some real a , then [tex]f(x) = (x-a)h(x)[/tex], where h is a polynomial of degree [tex]n-1[/tex]. So:

[tex]f(a) = \sum_{k=0}^{n} c_{k}a^{k} = c_{0} + c_{1}a + c_{2}a^{2} + ... + c_{n}a^{n} = 0[/tex]. In a hint it says to consider [tex]p(x) = f(x+a)[/tex]. So I expanded that and got: [tex]c_{0}+c_{1}(x+a)+c_{2}(x+a)^{2} + ... + c_{n}(x+a)^{n}[/tex]. So how do I use this to prove the above statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there exists a polynomial h(x) such that f(x) = (x-a)h(x), we say that (x-a) is a factor of f(x). In general, if f(x) and g(x) are any two polynomials, then if there exists h(x) such that f(x) = g(x)h(x), we say that g(x) is a factor of f(x). So the problem asks you to prove that if f(a) = 0, then (x-a) is a factor of f(x). Do you see that it suffices to prove that x is a factor of p(x), given that p(x) is defined as f(x+a)?

Well you know that f(a) = 0, which gives:

[tex]c_{0} + c_{1}a + c_{2}a^{2} + ... + c_{n}a^{n} = 0[/tex]

And you've written out p(x) as:

[tex]c_{0}+c_{1}(x+a)+c_{2}(x+a)^{2} + ... + c_{n}(x+a)^{n}[/tex]

Can you put these two facts together to show that x divides p(x), i.e. that x is a factor of p(x)?
 
Well [tex]c_{0}+c_{1}(x+a)+c_{2}(x+a)^{2} + ... + c_{n}(x+a)^{n} = c_{0} + c_{1}x+c_{1}a + c_{2}x^{2} + 2c_{2}xa + c_{2}a^{2} + ... + c_{n}(x+a)^{n}[/tex]. I know that we can factor out the [tex]f(a)[/tex] and set it equal to 0. But then what is the new expression. Also could you explain why it suffices to prove that x is a factor of [tex]p(x)[/tex] if [tex]p(x) = f(x+a)[/tex]?

Thanks
 
You want to show that (x-a) is a factor of f(x). Do you see how this is related to showing that x is a factor of p(x)=f(x+a)? Or perhaps showing that t is a factor of f(t+a)?
 
When I first looked at this, I didn't understand it either. But after some deep thinking, it started making sense.

If (x - a) is a factor of f(x), the x is a factor of p(x). Why? Because if we assume that f(x) = (x - a) h(x) for some h(x), then p(x) = f(x + a) = (x + a - a)h(x) = x h(x).

Do you understand now?

I'll give you a hint to prove that x is a factor of p(x): p(x) = f(x + a) = f(x + a) - f(a) since f(a) = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K