Proving Prime Numbers: The Equation Test for Primality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of proving that certain derived equations of prime numbers yield prime results. Specifically, participants debate the validity of the expression (2^p - 1) being prime when p is prime, noting that it fails for p = 11. The conversation also explores the existence of polynomials that consistently produce prime numbers when prime inputs are used, concluding that such polynomials do not exist due to divisibility properties. The discussion references the polynomial form P(n + a*prime) being divisible by "prime," indicating a fundamental limitation in finding such functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and factorization
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and divisibility rules
  • Basic comprehension of mathematical functions and their behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Mersenne primes and their relation to (2^p - 1)
  • Study polynomial functions and their factorization techniques
  • Explore the concept of prime-generating polynomials and their limitations
  • Investigate mathematical proofs related to divisibility and prime numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of prime numbers and polynomial functions.

l-1j-cho
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
how do you prove, if p is prime, then a derived equation of p is prime, if true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi l-1j-cho! :smile:

What exactly do you mean with "a derived equation of p"?
 
hello!

uhm, I don't know anything in particular, but something like
if p is prime, the following equation is prime
or if p is prime, (2^p -1) is prime such things
 
l-1j-cho said:
hello!

uhm, I don't know anything in particular, but something like
if p is prime, the following equation is prime
or if p is prime, (2^p -1) is prime such things
You can't be saying "if p is prime, (2^p - 1) is prime" because that is not true for p = 11. But it is easy to show that (2^p -1) can be prime only if p is prime. As for equations being prime, do you mean proving that a polynominal is not factorable into the product of two polynominals of lower degree? Or do you mean to show that a certain polynomial in n yields primes for all positive values of n less than a certain integer?
 
Last edited:
oh right my apology

I mean polynomials that is expressed in terms of p.
obviously, polynomials like p^2+5p+6 is not prime because if can be factored to (p+2)(p+3)
but my question is, how do you prove that a random polynomials always spits out a prime number whenever we plug in a prime number?

but before that, would such polynomial exist?
(not necesarrily polynomials but exponents or other stuff)
 
l-1j-cho said:
oh right my apology

I mean polynomials that is expressed in terms of p.
obviously, polynomials like p^2+5p+6 is not prime because if can be factored to (p+2)(p+3)
but my question is, how do you prove that a random polynomials always spits out a prime number whenever we plug in a prime number?

but before that, would such polynomial exist?
(not necesarrily polynomials but exponents or other stuff)
It has been proven that such polynominals don't exist since if P(n) is prime then P(n+a*prime) is also divisible by "prime",
. Don't know but very much doubt that there is some exotic function in P that is prime for all prime P.
 
Last edited:
thank you!
 
ramsey2879 said:
P(n+a*prime) is also divisible by prime,
QUOTE]

sorry but, could you explain about this more?
 
ramsey2879 said:
It has been proven that such polynominals don't exist since if P(n) is prime then P(n+a*prime) is also divisible by "prime",
. Don't know but very much doubt that there is some exotic function in P that is prime for all prime P.

The fun thing that there IS such a function! The function is totally useless, but it exists: http://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts/ffiles/10003.5.shtml
 
  • #10
l-1j-cho said:
ramsey2879 said:
P(n+a*prime) is also divisible by prime,
QUOTE]

sorry but, could you explain about this more?

Sure 3p +2 = 23 for p = 7, so for p = 7 + a*23 e.g. for p = 7,30,53,... ,3p + 2 is divisible by 23 and hence not prime. The same goes for any polynominal in p.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K