Proving Properties of a Nested Family of Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Willy_Will
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Sets
Willy_Will
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Im having trouble with this problem, I don't know where to begin.

Suppose that Ä is a nested family of sets.

1. Prove that U (from k=1 to infite) A(sub k) = A(sub l)

2. Prove that ∩ (from k=1 to n) A(sub k) = A(sub n)


Thanks in advace mathematicians!

-William
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) To show that they are equal you must show that they are subsets of one another.

2) If x is in the union of a collection of sets, what does this mean?

3) If x is in the intersection of a collection of sets, what does this mean?

4) You have to use the assumption of nested somewhere.

5) If A is a subset of B what can you say about A n b?

6) If A is a subset of B what can you say about A U B?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top