Proving R is Bigger Than N Set Elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the cardinality of the set of real numbers, \mathbb{R}, is greater than that of the natural numbers, \mathbb{N}. It highlights Cantor's theorem, which states that no bijection exists between these two sets. A proof is mentioned that illustrates this concept through a simple idea, although it may not be immediately apparent to those unfamiliar with it. Participants express appreciation for the clarity and effectiveness of the proof. The conversation emphasizes the significance of understanding set cardinality in mathematics.
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,398
Reaction score
4,079
that the number of elements of \mathbb{R} (seen as a set, obviously) is bigger than the number of elements of \mathbb{N} ...? :bugeye:

Daniel.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Two sets have the same cardinality iff there exists a bijection between the sets. Cantor showed that there is no bijection between \mathbb{R} and \mathbb{N}. A "[URL proof[/URL] of this involves a very simple idea - simple once one has seen it, but not until then.

Regards,
George
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thankyou for the reply.

Daniel.
 
Very nice. I've never seen that proof before.
 
Wow...that's good!
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I (0,1) is uncountable using binary expansions?
Replies
15
Views
2K
MHB Number of multiplications and divisions for LU decomposition
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Proof of a fact about real numbers - transcendental and algebraic
Replies
7
Views
1K
Can you use Taylor Series with mathematical objects other than points?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Prove ##1 + a=s(a)=a+1## for ##a \in \mathbb{N}##
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Challenge problem #5 [Olinguito]
Replies
2
Views
1K
Defining Vectors: Scalars vs 1-Dimensional Vectors
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Zero raised to a positive real number
Replies
12
Views
2K
A Why the triangle inequality is greater than the 2 max{f(x),g(x)}
Replies
1
Views
1K
I SL(n,R) Lie group as submanifold of GL(n,R)
Replies
36
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top