Proving rational function converges from first principles

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the derivation of the inequality |x - 4| > 1/2 from the condition |x - 3| < 1/2. One participant attempts two algebraic methods to arrive at the expression but struggles with the second method, which leads to incorrect conclusions. Clarifications are provided that highlight the importance of understanding the properties of inequalities versus equations, particularly when applying absolute values. The key takeaway is that the manipulation of inequalities requires careful consideration, as not all operations maintain the same relational properties. The conversation emphasizes the need for a solid grasp of algebraic principles in proving convergence of rational functions.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Epsilon-Delta definition of a limit
For this problem,
1712889043063.png

I am confused how they get $$| x - 4 | > \frac{1}{2}$$ from. I have tried deriving that expression from two different methods. Here is the first method:

$$-1\frac{1}{2} < x - 4 < -\frac{1}{2}$$
$$1\frac{1}{2} > -(x - 4) > \frac{1}{2}$$
$$|1\frac{1}{2}| > |-(x - 4)| > |\frac{1}{2}|$$
$$1\frac{1}{2} > |-1||x - 4| > \frac{1}{2}$$
$$1\frac{1}{2} > |x - 4| > \frac{1}{2}$$
Thus $$ |x - 4| > \frac{1}{2}$$

However, I also have an alternative method, but I am unsure why it is not giving the correct expression. Here the second method:

$$-1\frac{1}{2} < x - 4 < -\frac{1}{2}$$
$$|-1\frac{1}{2}| < |x - 4| < |-\frac{1}{2}|$$
$$1\frac{1}{2} < |x - 4| < \frac{1}{2}$$

Does someone please know what I have done wrong?

Thank you - Chiral
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
I am confused how they get $$| x - 4 | > \frac{1}{2}$$ from.
That is because ##|x-3|<\frac {1}{2}## so ##x## is closer to 3 than it is to 4..
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes WWGD and member 731016
FactChecker said:
That is because ##|x-3|<\frac {1}{2}## so ##x## is closer to 3 than it is to 4..
Thank you for your reply @FactChecker!

Sorry I am still confused. I am trying to understand how they algebraically derive $$|x - 4| > \frac{1}{2}$$

Thanks!
 
1) You can look on the number line and see it geometrically.
or
2) |x-3| <1/2
=> x-3 < 1/2
=> x-4 < 1/2-1 = -1/2
=> 4-x > 1/2
=> |x-4| > 1/2
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
FactChecker said:
1) You can look on the number line and see it geometrically.
or
2) |x-3| <1/2
=> x-3 < 1/2
=> x-4 < 1/2-1 = -1/2
=> 4-x > 1/2
=> |x-4| > 1/2
Thank for your reply @FactChecker!

However, I am still confused. Do you please know why you only consider the positive case when you take off the absolute value off x - 3 i.e not $$-(x - 3) < 1/2$$?

Do you also please know whether my two algebraic methods are correct?

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
$$-1\frac{1}{2} < x - 4 < -\frac{1}{2}$$
$$|-1\frac{1}{2}| < |x - 4| < |-\frac{1}{2}|$$
This is your error. ##x-4 \lt -\frac{1}{2}## does not imply ##|x-4|\lt |-\frac{1}{2}|##.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
FactChecker said:
This is your error. ##x-4 \lt -\frac{1}{2}## does not imply ##|x-4|\lt |-\frac{1}{2}|##.
Thank you for your reply @FactChecker!

That is interesting, do you please know why? I took the absolute value of all three sides of the equation from the law of algebra. I thought they would be equivalent since I did the same thing to each side of the equation.

Thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
That is interesting, do you please know why? I took the absolute value of all three sides of the equation from the law of algebra. I thought they would be equivalent since I did the same thing to each side of the equation.
These are not equations. When you have a comparison like ##-100 \lt 1##, which is not an equation, you can not just do the same thing to both sides and know that the same comparison still works.
##-100 \lt 1## does not mean that ##|-100 |\lt |1|##.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
It there is equality, then any function applied to equal things will give equal answers. If ##x1=x2##, then ##f(x1)=f(x2)##. Otherwise, the function ##f()## is not well defined. But if there is some other relationship between ##x1## and ##x2## different from equality, that can not be guarantied.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
989
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K