Proving Real Value of Hard Quantum Question Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the expressions for the expectation value of position and momentum, =∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x) ψ dx and =∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x)xψ dx, are incorrect as they yield imaginary values. The correct approach involves demonstrating that the sum of these integrals leads to a real value. The conclusion drawn is that while the individual expressions are not valid, their combination results in a correct expectation value, affirming that -=iħ remains valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically expectation values.
  • Familiarity with integration by parts in the context of quantum wave functions.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties in quantum physics.
  • Proficiency in manipulating wave functions and operators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of expectation values in quantum mechanics using Dirac notation.
  • Learn about the implications of complex conjugates in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian operators and their significance in quantum theory.
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in quantum mechanical integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on the mathematical foundations of quantum theory and expectation values. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of quantum operators and their implications.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Prove that

Neither

<xp>=∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x) ψ dx

nor <xp>=∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x)xψ dx

is acceptable because both lead to imaginary value.Show that

<xp>=∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x) ψ dx + ∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x)xψ dx leads to real value.Does

<xp>=<x><p> ?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Taking * of proposed <xp>=∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x) ψ dx and carrying out by parts integral,I get

<xp>*= -iħ +<xp> ≠ <xp> .Hence, given expression for <xp> is not real where it should be so.

[What I am woried about,even <xp> comes out to be imaginary, <xp>-<px>=iħ is still OK.Because <xp>*=<px>]

Also,my attempts to show the second proposed expression leads to imaginary value failed:

<xp>=∫ψ* x(ħ/i)(∂/∂x)xψ dx

=> <xp>*=∫ψ x(-ħ/i) (∂/∂x)xψ* dx

=><xp>*=(iħ) ∫ψx (∂/∂x)xψ* dx =(iħ) [-∫xψ*(ψ+ x(∂ψ/∂x)) dx + 0]

where I assumed [x²ψ*ψ] gives zero in both +∞ and -∞ limit.

[I am not sure at this point too.As the term involves a factor x²]

Can anyone suggest if I am going through the correct way?If I am doing wrong in integration, please show it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given proposed expressions for [tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle=\int^\infty_{\ - \infty}\psi\ast\ x \frac{\hbar}{i}[/tex][tex]\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\ x }[/tex][tex]\ dx[/tex]

Another given expression for [tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle=\int^\infty_{\ - \infty}\psi\ast\ x \frac{\hbar}{i}[/tex][tex]\frac{\partial(\ x \psi)}{\partial\ x }[/tex][tex]\ dx[/tex]

We are to show that neither is correct but the sum of the integrations is the correct expression for <xp_x>

I started with taking * of [tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle[/tex] of the first expression:

[tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle\ast=\frac{-\hbar}{i}\int_{\ - \infty}^\infty\psi\ x \frac{\partial\psi\ast}{\partial\ x }[/tex][tex]\ dx=[/tex][tex]\ i \hbar\ [\ - \int_{\ - \infty}^{\infty}\frac{\partial(\psi\ x )}{\partial\ x }\psi\ast\ dx\ + \(\psi\ast\ x \psi)_{\ - \infty}^{\infty}][/tex]

Last term=0

[tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle\ast=\ i \hbar\[\ - \int_{\ - \infty}^\infty\psi\ast\ (\psi + \ x \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\ x})\ dx \]=\ - \ i \hbar\ + \langle\ x \ p_x \rangle[/tex]

But this is not [tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle[/tex].So, we conclude given expression of [tex]\langle\ x \ p_x \rangle[/tex] is not correct because the expectation value must be a real quantity Q such that Q*=Q

Note an interesting thing! Even if the expression is not correct,it correctly leads to <xp>-<px>=iħ as <xp>*=<px>

But I am in trouble with the second integration.It appears that the conjugate of the second integral should be equal to iħ so that the sum of the two integrals be <xp>

Can anyone please suggest anything?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K