Proving Recursion relations for Bessel Functions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 8K views
gametheory
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve equations 1) and 2) for J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x) and J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x). Add and subtract these two equations to get 3) and 4).


Homework Equations


1) [itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)] = x[itex]^{p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x)
2) [itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{-p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)] = -x[itex]^{-p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x)
3) J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x) + J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x) = [itex]\frac{2p}{x}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)
4) J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x) - J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x) = 2J[itex]^{'}_{p}[/itex](x)


The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem is I'm not really sure what the question is asking me to do in the first part. Am I supposed to plug p+1 and p-1 into J[itex]_{p}[/itex] on the left of each equation or am I supposed to simply solve equation 1) as J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x) = x[itex]^{-p}[/itex][itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)] and equation 2) as J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x) = -x[itex]^{p}[/itex][itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{-p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)]? I tried this way and then differentiated the series and got two infinite series I didn't know what to do with.

Next, I tried to substitute J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex] into J[itex]_{p}[/itex] and I integrated on both sides and just got J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex] = J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex] after rearranging everything.

I feel like this isn't an overly difficult problem, but I just have no idea what direction to take with it.
 
on Phys.org
gametheory said:
My main problem is I'm not really sure what the question is asking me to do in the first part. Am I supposed to plug p+1 and p-1 into J[itex]_{p}[/itex] on the left of each equation or am I supposed to simply solve equation 1) as J[itex]_{p-1}[/itex](x) = x[itex]^{-p}[/itex][itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)] and equation 2) as J[itex]_{p+1}[/itex](x) = -x[itex]^{p}[/itex][itex]\frac{d}{dx}[/itex][x[itex]^{-p}[/itex]J[itex]_{p}[/itex](x)]? I tried this way and then differentiated the series and got two infinite series I didn't know what to do with.

Yes, it's saying the latter, but I don't know what you mean about getting infinite series; if you expand the derivative on the RHS in each case, you can just use the product rule to get one term with the Bessel function and one term with its derivative (and adding these or subtracting should give the two results).
 
Nevermind, you're right, I got it. All the other problems had us manipulate the bessel function as an infinite series and I was just used to doing this. Forgot to try basic rules from calculus...haha thanks