Proving Recursion relations for Bessel Functions

gametheory
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve equations 1) and 2) for J_{p+1}(x) and J_{p-1}(x). Add and subtract these two equations to get 3) and 4).


Homework Equations


1) \frac{d}{dx}[x^{p}J_{p}(x)] = x^{p}J_{p-1}(x)
2) \frac{d}{dx}[x^{-p}J_{p}(x)] = -x^{-p}J_{p+1}(x)
3) J_{p-1}(x) + J_{p+1}(x) = \frac{2p}{x}J_{p}(x)
4) J_{p-1}(x) - J_{p+1}(x) = 2J^{'}_{p}(x)


The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem is I'm not really sure what the question is asking me to do in the first part. Am I supposed to plug p+1 and p-1 into J_{p} on the left of each equation or am I supposed to simply solve equation 1) as J_{p-1}(x) = x^{-p}\frac{d}{dx}[x^{p}J_{p}(x)] and equation 2) as J_{p+1}(x) = -x^{p}\frac{d}{dx}[x^{-p}J_{p}(x)]? I tried this way and then differentiated the series and got two infinite series I didn't know what to do with.

Next, I tried to substitute J_{p+1} into J_{p} and I integrated on both sides and just got J_{p+1} = J_{p+1} after rearranging everything.

I feel like this isn't an overly difficult problem, but I just have no idea what direction to take with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gametheory said:
My main problem is I'm not really sure what the question is asking me to do in the first part. Am I supposed to plug p+1 and p-1 into J_{p} on the left of each equation or am I supposed to simply solve equation 1) as J_{p-1}(x) = x^{-p}\frac{d}{dx}[x^{p}J_{p}(x)] and equation 2) as J_{p+1}(x) = -x^{p}\frac{d}{dx}[x^{-p}J_{p}(x)]? I tried this way and then differentiated the series and got two infinite series I didn't know what to do with.

Yes, it's saying the latter, but I don't know what you mean about getting infinite series; if you expand the derivative on the RHS in each case, you can just use the product rule to get one term with the Bessel function and one term with its derivative (and adding these or subtracting should give the two results).
 
Nevermind, you're right, I got it. All the other problems had us manipulate the bessel function as an infinite series and I was just used to doing this. Forgot to try basic rules from calculus...haha thanks
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top