Proving stable equilibrium: Rotating circular hoop

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a rotating circular hoop with a bead sliding frictionlessly under gravity. The key condition for the bead to maintain a fixed angle θ0 (not equal to 0 or π) is given by the equation ω = √(g/cos(θ0)), where ω is the angular frequency and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The frequency of small oscillations around this stable equilibrium is derived from the governing equation of motion, leading to the conclusion that the system behaves like a harmonic oscillator, confirming the stability of θ0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with harmonic oscillators
  • Knowledge of angular motion and forces in cylindrical coordinates
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric identities and Taylor expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics in detail to understand the derivation of equations of motion
  • Learn about harmonic oscillators and their stability criteria
  • Explore the application of Taylor series in physics for approximating functions
  • Investigate the dynamics of rotating systems and their equilibrium conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, dynamics of rotating systems, and stability analysis of equilibrium points.

JyJ
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A circular hoop of radius R rotates with angular frequency ω about a vertical axis coincident with its diameter. A bead of mass m slides frictionlessly under gravity on the hoop. Let θ be the bead’s angular position relative to the vertical (so that θ = 0 corresponds to the bead being at the bottom of the hoop).
Under what conditions can the bead sit at a fixed angle θ_0 not equal to 0 or π?
Show that this situation corresponds to a stable equilibrium, and determine the frequency of small oscillations about this stable equilibrium.

Homework Equations


In cylindrical coordinates:
$$\vec{v} = \dot{r}\vec{e_r} + r\dot{\theta}\vec{e_\theta} + rsin(\theta)\dot{\phi}\vec{e_\phi}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


By using Lagrangian methods I found that the equation of motion is:
$$mR^2\ddot{\theta} + mgRsin(\theta)-mR^2(\omega)^2sin(\theta)cos(\theta)=0$$ which agrees with the solution given.
By plugging:
$$\ddot{\theta} = \dot{\theta} = 0$$
For the first question I got the following as a condition on θ_0:
$$\omega = \sqrt{\frac{g}{cos(\theta_0)}}$$
I also then computed the frequency of small deviations from equilibrium by using Taylor expansion with:
$$\theta = \theta_0 + a$$
where a is the small deviation of order h from stable equilibrium. Them by getting rid off terms of order h2 or higher I found the frequency to be:
$$R^2\ddot{a} + gRsin(a+\theta_0) - \frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}sin(a+\theta_0)cos(a+\theta_0)=0
\\ R^2\ddot{a} + gR(a+\theta_0)-\frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}(a+\theta_0) = 0$$
which leads to frequency equal to:
$$\frac{\frac{Rg}{cos(\theta_0)}-g}{R}$$
This is how I think the frequency would be found.
Now, the only bit that is left to prove is to show that θ=θ_0 indeed corresponds to the stable equilibrium. I am having difficulties with this part as I am not sure how to show it using the information I have. Typically I would be able to estimate stable equilibrium from the minimum of the potential but in this case my potential is dependent on both y and x and so I am unsure what to do:
$$ U = -mgRcos(\theta) = -mgRcos(arctan\frac{y}{x}) $$

I would appreciate any comments and advice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JyJ said:
For the first question I got the following as a condition on θ_0:
$$\omega = \sqrt{\frac{g}{cos(\theta_0)}}$$
This equation is dimensionally incorrect. You probably need a factor of ##R## in the denominator.
I also don't see how you got from the first line to the second.
$$R^2\ddot{a} + gRsin(a+\theta_0) - \frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}sin(a+\theta_0)cos(a+\theta_0)=0
\\ R^2\ddot{a} + gR(a+\theta_0)-\frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}(a+\theta_0) = 0$$
For example, ##\sin (a+\theta_0)=\sin a \cos \theta_0+ \cos a \sin \theta_0##. This is exact. For small ##a##, you get (to first order) ##\sin(a+\theta_0)\approx a\cos \theta_0+\sin \theta_0##. It seems that you are assuming that ##\theta_0## is small when it isn't. For the other term you can save yourself some work and write ##\sin (a+\theta_0) \cos (a+\theta_0) = \frac{1}{2}\sin[2(a+\theta_0)]## then expand the sine to first order as before.
 
kuruman said:
This equation is dimensionally incorrect. You probably need a factor of ##R## in the denominator.
I also don't see how you got from the first line to the second.
$$R^2\ddot{a} + gRsin(a+\theta_0) - \frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}sin(a+\theta_0)cos(a+\theta_0)=0
\\ R^2\ddot{a} + gR(a+\theta_0)-\frac{gR^2}{cos(\theta_0)}(a+\theta_0) = 0$$
For example, ##\sin (a+\theta_0)=\sin a \cos \theta_0+ \cos a \sin \theta_0##. This is exact. For small ##a##, you get (to first order) ##\sin(a+\theta_0)\approx a\cos \theta_0+\sin \theta_0##. It seems that you are assuming that ##\theta_0## is small when it isn't. For the other term you can save yourself some work and write ##\sin (a+\theta_0) \cos (a+\theta_0) = \frac{1}{2}\sin[2(a+\theta_0)]## then expand the sine to first order as before.
Thank you for your reply! Yes, you are correct there is a missing R in the denominator for w_0 and yes, I should not have treated θ_0 as a small quantity - my mistake. This all makes sense now though!
The question also asks to show that θ_0 is a stable equilibrium, how can I can show this mathematically? I rearranged the governing equation with the deduced condition on w_0 and got this:
$$\ddot{\theta} = \frac{g}{R}sin(\theta)(\frac{cos(\theta)}{cos(\theta_0)} -1)$$
and plotted an easier case which is when θ_0 = pi/3 and g/R = 1 (graph here):
$$ \ddot{\theta} = 2sin(\theta)cos(\theta) - sin(\theta)$$
from which it doesn't look that pi/3 is an equilibrium point at all, because at this value we get that the whole equation is zero. Am I confusing things up?
 
I suggest that you go back to the equation of motion
$$mR^2\ddot{\theta} + mgR\sin(\theta)-mR^2(\omega)^2\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)=0$$
Leave ##\omega## as is; it is a given quantity after all. Rewrite this equation in the vicinity of ##\theta_0## as you started doing
$$R\ddot{a} + gsin(\theta_0+a)-R(\omega)^2\sin(\theta_0+a)\cos(\theta_0+a)=0$$
Use trig identities to expand the trig functions, then expand the trig functions themselves keeping only first order terms in ##a##. For example,
$$\sin(\theta_0+a)=\sin\theta_0 \cos a+\sin a \cos\theta_0 \approx \sin\theta_0 +a \cos\theta_0.$$You should be able to cast this equation into the harmonic oscillator equation in the form ##\ddot{a} + \omega_s^2 a+C=0##, where ##\omega_s## is the frequency of small oscillations about ##\theta_0## and ##C## is a constant related to the equilibrium position.
 
kuruman said:
I suggest that you go back to the equation of motion
$$mR^2\ddot{\theta} + mgR\sin(\theta)-mR^2(\omega)^2\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)=0$$
Leave ##\omega## as is; it is a given quantity after all. Rewrite this equation in the vicinity of ##\theta_0## as you started doing
$$R\ddot{a} + gsin(\theta_0+a)-R(\omega)^2\sin(\theta_0+a)\cos(\theta_0+a)=0$$
Use trig identities to expand the trig functions, then expand the trig functions themselves keeping only first order terms in ##a##. For example,
$$\sin(\theta_0+a)=\sin\theta_0 \cos a+\sin a \cos\theta_0 \approx \sin\theta_0 +a \cos\theta_0.$$You should be able to cast this equation into the harmonic oscillator equation in the form ##\ddot{a} + \omega_s^2 a+C=0##, where ##\omega_s## is the frequency of small oscillations about ##\theta_0## and ##C## is a constant related to the equilibrium position.
Yes, I did get an equation of a harmonic oscillator and, hence, found the frequency. However, my question is that is this sufficient for showing that ##\theta_0## is indeed stable equilibrium, i.e. that since we have equation of a harmonic oscillator, we conclude that it is stable equilibrium?
 
Look at the equation you got in ##\ddot{\theta}##. Does it predict a restoring torque for small displacements ##\pm a## from ##\theta_0##?
 
kuruman said:
Look at the equation you got in ##\ddot{\theta}##. Does it predict a restoring torque for small displacements ##\pm a## from ##\theta_0##?
Thank you, I got it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K