Proving Symmetry and Finding Conserved Quantities for Lagrangian Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving symmetry in Lagrangian functions and identifying conserved quantities. The original poster presents a problem involving a Lagrangian L that depends on generalized coordinates, their time derivatives, and time itself, specifically focusing on the implications of an infinitesimal translation of the coordinate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of proving symmetry by examining the change in the Lagrangian under an infinitesimal translation. There is mention of using a Taylor expansion to analyze the behavior of the Lagrangian after the transformation. Questions arise regarding the specifics of the Taylor series, particularly the choice of terms and parameters involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Taylor expansion and the Euler-Lagrange equation to find conserved quantities, but there is no explicit consensus on the steps to take.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the proper procedure to prove symmetry and find conserved quantities, with participants questioning the definitions and assumptions related to the Taylor expansion and the variables involved.

sunmaggot
Messages
62
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Given L (q, dq/dt, t).
translation: q ---> q + e (e is infinitesimal constant)
show that if ∂L/∂q = 0, then L is symmetry under the above translation.
then find conserved quantity.

Homework Equations


S = ∫ L dt

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is nothing... because I don't know the proper procedure to prove a symmetry. Do I simply prove L' - L = 0? But then the next part askes me to find conserved quantity. I have no idea how to find it...
So, can anyone spare me some hints...?[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##L_1=L_1(q, \dot{q}, t)## and ##L_2## that with the replacement ##q\rightarrow q+ \epsilon##. Now consider the expansion of ##L_2## in the infinitesimal parameter ##\epsilon##.
 
CAF123 said:
Let ##L_1=L_1(q, \dot{q}, t)## and ##L_2## that with the replacement ##q\rightarrow q+ \epsilon##. Now consider the expansion of ##L_2## in the infinitesimal parameter ##\epsilon##.
do you mean taylor expansion??
 
sunmaggot said:
But then the next part askes me to find conserved quantity. I have no idea how to find it...

A conserved quantity means null time derivative of that quantity. Look at the Euler-Lagrange equation.
 
sunmaggot said:
do you mean taylor expansion??
Yup :)
 
CAF123 said:
Yup :)
cool, I will try it first!
 
CAF123 said:
Yup :)
the taylor series has a term (x-a), what should be the a?
 
sunmaggot said:
the taylor series has a term (x-a), what should be the a?

What should be the x?
 
ddd123 said:
What should be the x?
x is q?
 
  • #10
That's not what CAF123 suggested you to do. L is a function of phase space: you are interested in a small perturbation of the position variable, which changes the whole function L. So this means taking a McLaurin expansion in the infinitesimal translation parameter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K