Proving the Containment Property of Polar Cones for Sets in R^n

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter avilaca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polar Property
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 3K views
avilaca
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let S1*(S2*) be the polar cone of the set S1(S2) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_cone_and_polar_cone).

How can I show that if S1 is contained in S2 then S2* is contained in S1*.

It looks obvious (especially if we think in R^2), but I do not find a way to prove it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi avilaca! welcome to pf! :smile:
avilaca said:
How can I show that if S1 is contained in S2 then S2* is contained in S1*.

It looks obvious (especially if we think in R^2), but I do not find a way to prove it.

isn't the proof obvious from the definition based on inner product? (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_cone_and_polar_cone) :wink:
 
Ok, it's easy from the inner product <a,s> = ||a||.||s||cos[itex]\theta[/itex].
<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> pi/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] [itex]\theta[/itex] [itex]\leq[/itex] 3pi/2.
This means that if S1 [itex]\subset[/itex] S2, by the above result, the region where the condition {<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 , s [itex]\in[/itex] S1 or S2, a [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]} is true for S1 is the same or it's larger than the one for S2, which implies S2* [itex]\subset[/itex] S1*.
 
Now another challenge:

Let S = {x [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x = Ap, p [itex]\geq[/itex] 0}, where A [itex]\in[/itex] M[itex]_{n*m}[/itex], p [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{m}[/itex].
What is its polar cone S*?
 
avilaca said:
Ok, it's easy from the inner product <a,s> = ||a||.||s||cos[itex]\theta[/itex].
<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> pi/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] [itex]\theta[/itex] [itex]\leq[/itex] 3pi/2.
This means that if S1 [itex]\subset[/itex] S2, by the above result, the region where the condition {<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 , s [itex]\in[/itex] S1 or S2, a [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]} is true for S1 is the same or it's larger than the one for S2, which implies S2* [itex]\subset[/itex] S1*.

looks good! :smile:
avilaca said:
Now another challenge:

Let S = {x [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x = Ap, p [itex]\geq[/itex] 0}, where A [itex]\in[/itex] M[itex]_{n*m}[/itex], p [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{m}[/itex].
What is its polar cone S*?

show us what you get :wink:
 
I didn't achieve a great conclusion.

S* can be defined by {a [itex]\in[/itex] R[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0, for all x [itex]\in[/itex] S}.

Now:
x[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> (Ap)[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> p[itex]^{T}[/itex]A[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0.

But I can not conclude nothing about "a" from here.