Proving the Convergence of a Series: A Simple and Concise Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter synkk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of a series, specifically showing that if a sequence \( a_n \) converges, then the limit of the tail of the series approaches zero. Participants are exploring the implications of convergence and the definitions of partial sums.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish the relationship between the convergence of the series and the behavior of its tail. There are questions about the definitions used for the partial sums and the implications of convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the correctness of certain definitions and expressions related to the series. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions of the sums, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definition of the partial sums \( S_k \) and the implications of the index \( m \) being any integer, which may include negative values. Participants are also considering how the convergence of a series is not affected by a finite number of initial terms.

synkk
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
show that if ## a_n ## is any sequence and m is any integer such that the series ## \displaystyle \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n ## converges, then ## \displaystyle\lim_{k \to \infty} \sum_{n=k}^{\infty
} a_n = 0 ##

let ## S_N = \displaystyle \sum_{n=m}^N a_n ##

## \lim_{N \to \infty} S_N = l ## from definition
also,
## \lim_{N \to \infty} S_{N-1} = l ##

## S_N - S_{N-1} = a_N ##

## \lim_{N \to \infty} (S_N - S_{N-1}) = \lim_{N \to \infty}(S_N) - \lim_{N \to \infty} S_{N-1} = 0 ## then ## \lim_{N \to \infty} a_N = 0 ## i.e. ## \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=m}^N a_n = 0 \Rightarrow \lim_{k \to \infty} \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} a_n = 0 ##

as you can see I don't really know how to prove this statement, but I have attempted it.

Could someone show me how I can proceed to do the proof properly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
synkk said:
show that if ## a_n ## is any sequence and m is any integer such that the series ## \displaystyle \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n ## converges, then ## \displaystyle\lim_{k \to \infty} \sum_{n=k}^{\infty
} a_n = 0 ##

let ## S_N = \displaystyle \sum_{n=m}^N a_n ##

## \lim_{N \to \infty} S_N = l ## from definition
also,
## \lim_{N \to \infty} S_{N-1} = l ##

## S_N - S_{N-1} = a_N ##

## \lim_{N \to \infty} (S_N - S_{N-1}) = \lim_{N \to \infty}(S_N) - \lim_{N \to \infty} S_{N-1} = 0 ## then ## \lim_{N \to \infty} a_N = 0 ## i.e. ## \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=m}^N a_n = 0 \Rightarrow \lim_{k \to \infty} \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} a_n = 0 ##

as you can see I don't really know how to prove this statement, but I have attempted it.

Could someone show me how I can proceed to do the proof properly?

You are given that
<br /> \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n<br />
converges. Thus you have
<br /> L = \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1} + \sum_{n = k}^{\infty} a_n<br />
so that
<br /> |L - S_{k-1}| = \left| \sum_{n = k}^{\infty} a_n \right|<br />
 
pasmith said:
You are given that
<br /> \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n<br />
converges. Thus you have
<br /> L = \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1} + \sum_{n = k}^{\infty} a_n<br />
so that
<br /> |L - S_{k-1}| = \left| \sum_{n = k}^{\infty} a_n \right|<br />
how did you get ## L = \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1} + \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} a_n ##?
 
synkk said:
how did you get ## L = \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1} + \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} a_n ##?

They've just written it as a sum of two series.
 
I do not believe it is correct though.
It should read L=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1}+\sum_{n=k}^\infty a_n.
This is to be seen from the definition of S_k = \sum_{n=0}^k a_n.

The final step in post #2 is correct. (Although I'm not entirely sure why the absolute value shows up, but it doesn't make any difference here)
 
JorisL said:
I do not believe it is correct though.
It should read L=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n = S_{k-1}+\sum_{n=k}^\infty a_n.
This is to be seen from the definition of S_k = \sum_{n=0}^k a_n.

Read the OP. We are told that \sum_{n=m}^\infty a_n converges for some integer m. In particular, we are not told that m is positive. Therefore the OP's definition of S_k = \sum_{n=m}^{k} a_n is correct.

However, in any event the behaviour of a finite number of terms at the beginning of a sequence does not affect convergence of the series.
 
My bad, sorry for the confusion.
But this doesn't change anything indeed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K