Proving the Direct Sum Decomposition of V using Linear Maps

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the direct sum decomposition of a vector space V using a linear map T from V to a field F (either R or C). The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that if an element u of V is not in the null space of T, then V can be expressed as the direct sum of the null space of T and the subspace generated by u.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers defining a subspace U generated by u and showing that each element of V can be uniquely expressed as a sum of u and an element from the null space. Participants discuss the implications of uniqueness in representation and the necessity of proving U is a subspace.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the implications of their reasoning regarding the uniqueness of representations in the context of the direct sum. There is acknowledgment of the need to clarify certain assumptions, such as the dimensionality of V and the nature of elements in the null space. Guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the proof without reaching a consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumption of V being finite-dimensional, which affects their reasoning about the dimensions of null(T) and range(T). There is also a discussion about the uniqueness of elements in the null space and whether proving U as a subspace is necessary.

*melinda*
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that T is a linear map from V to F, where F is either R or C. Prove that if u is an element of V and u is not an element of null(T), then

V = null(T) (direct sum) {au : a is in F}.

2. Relevant information
null(T) is a subspace of V
For all u in V, u is not in null(T)
For all n in V, n is in null(T)
T(n) = 0, T(u) not= 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I should let U = {au : a is in F} and show that it's a subspace of V. Then I can show that each element of V can be written uniquely as a sum of u + n. Should I do this by showing that (u, n) is a basis for V?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the dimension of null(T) in terms of the dimension of V?
 
if V were finite dimensional then I could say, dim{null(T)} = dim(V) - dim{range(T)}.

But nothing given in the problem statement will let me assume V is finite.
 
Ok, I think I was thinking about this wrong. Suppose x=a*u+n and x=a'*u+n' where n and n' are in the null space. Then T(x)=a*T(u)=a'*T(u). Since T(u) is nonzero, a=a'. Right? So x=a*u+n and x=a*u+n'. Can n and n' be different?
 
n and n' could definitely be different, but I don't think it matters much since they both get mapped to zero.

Is the result of a = a' is enough to prove uniqueness for a direct sum?
 
It does matter in V. But if x=a*u+n and x=a*u+n' (after you've shown a=a') then n=x-a*u and n'=x-a*u. Conclusion?
 
Gosh, I must be getting sleepy to overlook the importance of n being unique.

So, I can show that each element of V can be written uniquely as a sum of u + n.

Should I also prove U = {au : a is in F} is a subspace of V
 
*melinda* said:
Gosh, I must be getting sleepy to overlook the importance of n being unique.

So, I can show that each element of V can be written uniquely as a sum of u + n.

Should I also prove U = {au : a is in F} is a subspace of V

Even being sleepy, I think you could, right? I think it could actually be considered as 'obvious' and not deserving of proof.
 
:zzz:

I should be able to stay awake long enough to write down my solution.

Thanks for the help!
 
  • #10
Very, very welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K