Proving the Existence of Event Horizon in Homogeneous Spacetimes

hellfire
Science Advisor
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
Consider a Schwarzschild spacetime. If the singularity due to the point mass is removed (e.g. with an homogeneous matter distribution), does the event horizon disappear? If yes (I assume this is the case), how can be proven that there exists no event horizon if there is no singularity? May be it is enough to show that in the metric for the interior of stars (with homogeneous mass distribution) there is no change of the timelike coordinate from t to r at any r, as in case of the vacuum Schwarzschild solution for r = 2GM (Schutz p. 290)? I was not able to find an expression for the metric of the interior of stars to check this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's an analysis of the metric of a star with a constant density rho online

http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2002/chap25/0225.1.pdf

It's very detailed and long, being a chapter from a textbook, you'll probably have to print out & study it to get very far.

The same results are also in MTW's gravitation. This topic came up late in the thread "The Mass of a Body" that you'll find here on Physics Forum, though I'm not sure if there will be anything useful in that discussion for your question.

I think another poster, DW, once posted some formulas about static stars as well, you might try searching the physics forum for that, too.

As far as the event horizon goes, I think the best test is to consider whether or not light can escape from an object. If there are null geodesics that connect the interior of the star to the exterior, it doesn't have an event horizon. [I haven't double-checked this definition though.]

[add]
I should clarify, there should always be ingoing null geodesics, but if there is a horizon, there won't be outgoing ones.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, pervect, I will take a look. Your proposal to consider the outgoing geodesics to prove whether an event horizon exists or not seams to be the best one, but I can imagine it may be difficult to do the calculations. What do you think about this possibility:

hellfire said:
May be it is enough to show that in the metric for the interior of stars (with homogeneous mass distribution) there is no change of the timelike coordinate from t to r at any r, as in case of the vacuum Schwarzschild solution for r = 2GM (Schutz p. 290)?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top