Proving the existence of the arithmetic-geometric mean

  • Thread starter Thread starter NascentComp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of the arithmetic-geometric mean through the convergence of two sequences, \(a_n\) and \(b_n\). The proof utilizes limits and assumes a contradiction to show that if \(l_a \neq l_b\), it leads to a contradiction, thereby concluding \(l_a = l_b\). The participants suggest improving the proof style by transitioning from a proof by contradiction to a direct proof, which can simplify the argument significantly. Key insights include the relationship between the limits of the sequences and the arithmetic mean formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with sequences and convergence
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Basic algebra for manipulating limits and sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study direct proof techniques in mathematical analysis
  • Explore the properties of convergent sequences
  • Learn about the arithmetic-geometric mean and its applications
  • Investigate the implications of limits in calculus, focusing on sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus or real analysis, particularly those studying convergence and proof techniques.

NascentComp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[itex][/itex]
Given:
1. [itex]a_{1} < b_{1}[/itex]
2. [itex]a_{n} = \sqrt{a_{n-1}b_{n-1}}[/itex]
3. [itex]b_{n} = \frac{a_{n-1} + B_{n-1}}{2}[/itex]
4. The sequences [itex]a_{n}[/itex] and [itex]b_{n}[/itex] are convergent.

Prove: The sequences [itex]a_{n}[/itex] and [itex]b_{n}[/itex] have the same limit.

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume by contradiction that [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n} = l_{a}[/itex] and [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}b_{n} = l_{b}[/itex] and [itex]l_{a} \neq l_{b}[/itex].

Because [itex]b_{n} = \frac{a_{n-1} + B_{n-1}}{2}[/itex], we can write [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}b_{n} = \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n-1} + B_{n-1}}{2}[/itex].

From arithmetic of limits, we have [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n-1} + B_{n-1}}{2} = \frac{1}{2} (\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n-1} + \lim_{n\to\infty}B_{n-1})[/itex].

For all [itex]n \ge 2[/itex], the sequences [itex]a_{n}[/itex] and [itex]a_{n-1}[/itex] are identical. Thus their limit is identical, [itex]l_{a}[/itex].

The same is true of the sequences [itex]b_{n}[/itex] and [itex]b_{n-1}[/itex]. Thus their limit is identical too, [itex]l_{b}[/itex].

Thus, [itex]\frac{1}{2} (\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n-1} + \lim_{n\to\infty}B_{n-1}) = \frac{1}{2} (l_{a} + l_{b})[/itex].

We assumed, by way of contradiction, that [itex]l_{a} \neq l_{b}[/itex], that is either [itex]l_{a} < l_{b}[/itex] or [itex]l_{a} > l_{b}[/itex].

Assuming [itex]l_{a} < l_{b}[/itex], we get [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}b_{n} = \frac{1}{2} (l_{a} + l_{b}) < \frac{2l_{b}}{2} = l_{b}[/itex].

Assuming [itex]l_{a} > l_{b}[/itex], we get [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}b_{n} = \frac{1}{2} (l_{a} + l_{b}) > \frac{2l_{b}}{2} = l_{b}[/itex].

Thus, if [itex]l_{a} \neq l_{b}[/itex], then [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty}b_{n} \neq l_{b}[/itex]. Contradiction.

Therefore, [itex]l_{a} = l_{b}[/itex].

---

Here's my question. I wasn't sure that I didn't make some logical leap along the way. Is my attempt correct? Did I manage to prove what I set out to prove? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks fine. I do have a couple of remarks on style though. First, call the limits ##a## and ##b##. Second, try to see if you can get a direct proof. Proofs by contradiction are perfectly fine, but when there is a very easy way to turn a proof by contradiction into a direct proof (and there is here), I've always been told that the direct proof is preferable. In this case, when you use my tips with the key part of your argument, you get $$b=\lim b_n=\lim\frac{1}{2}(a_n+b_n)=\frac{1}{2}(a+b)$$ and the desired result is a couple steps of elementary algebra away.

Again, though, your version works. It's just a little messier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K