MHB Proving the Floor of nx using Fractional Parts and Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ragnarok7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the equality $$\lfloor nx \rfloor = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\lfloor x+k/n \rfloor$$ using properties of fractional parts and induction. The initial attempts involved breaking down $$x$$ into its integer and fractional components, but this approach proved cumbersome for general cases. A more effective method was proposed, defining the function $$f(x) := \left\lfloor{nx}\right\rfloor - \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \left\lfloor{x + \frac kn}\right\rfloor$$ and demonstrating that it satisfies specific periodic and boundary conditions, leading to the conclusion that $$f \equiv 0$$, thus validating the original equality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of floor functions and fractional parts in mathematics.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques.
  • Basic knowledge of properties of functions and periodicity.
  • Experience with inequalities and their implications in proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of floor functions in detail, particularly in relation to fractional parts.
  • Explore advanced techniques in mathematical induction, focusing on periodic functions.
  • Investigate other proofs of similar inequalities involving floor functions.
  • Learn about the implications of periodicity in mathematical functions and their proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in number theory, particularly those focusing on inequalities and proofs involving floor functions and fractional parts.

Ragnarok7
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Prove that $$\lfloor nx \rfloor = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\lfloor x+k/n \rfloor$$.

Note $$\lfloor x\rfloor$$ means the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$.

I proved the cases where n=2 and n=3 by writing $$x=\lfloor x\rfloor + \{x\}$$, where $$\{x\}$$ is the fractional part of $$x$$, and then using cases where $$0\leq \{x\}<\frac{1}{n}$$, $$\frac{1}{n}\leq \{x\}<\frac{2}{n}$$, $$\ldots$$, $$\frac{n-1}{n}\leq\{x\}<1$$. However, this is tedious and doesn't work in the general case. Does anyone have any suggestions for showing this? I don't see that induction will help.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The outline of a proof goes something like this.

Let $f(x) := \left\lfloor{nx}\right\rfloor - \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \left\lfloor{x + \frac kn}\right\rfloor$.

Show $f$ has the properties:

$(i)$: $f(x + \frac 1n) = f(x)$, and
$(ii)$: $f(x) = 0$ for $0 \leq x < \frac 1n$.

Then, claim that if $f$ has properties $(i)$ and $(ii)$, $f \equiv 0$, and thus the original equality holds.
 
Magneto, very clever. Well done.
 
Thank you! That is great and very simple. Can I ask how you got the idea to do it this way? I would never have thought of it.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K