Proving the Intersection of Altitudes in a Triangle Using Vector Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the three altitudes of a triangle intersect at a single point, using vector equations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the approach and mentions Ceva's theorem as a potential aid, but seeks a vectorial proof instead.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest using analytical geometry to derive equations for the altitudes and explore their intersection. There is mention of simplifying the problem by positioning two vertices at specific coordinates. The original poster attempts to parametrize the equations of the altitudes but encounters difficulties regarding the intersection points. Some participants introduce the cross-product as a relevant concept, while others explore connections to the law of sines.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing various ideas and approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of coordinates and the relationship between the altitudes and the sides of the triangle. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of vector equations and the relationships between triangle elements. There is an acknowledgment of missing information regarding the specific intersection points of the altitudes with their corresponding sides.

prace
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I tried doing a search for this one here, but I didn't seem to come up with much...

Homework Statement


Prove that the three altitudes of a triangle meet at one point.


Homework Equations


Well, I am not really sure, but I know that Ceva's theorem might help me prove this, but I want to prove it vectorally, so I don't know if it will be much help at all.


The Attempt at a Solution


My instructor gave a hint for this proof by saying, show each of the triangles cevians are perpandicular to its opposite side... :confused: I can see pictorally this is ok, but where to start...?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe try to use analytical geometry. Might become a little messy, but should work out just fine. Write down equations of lines passing through the vertices, and perpendicular to the opposite sides, and try to proove they intersect in one point.
 
Remember, you may as well assume that two of the vertices are at (0,0) and (1,0), with the third at (a,b); it will undoubtedly make life easier as you will have fewer variables floating around. The 'vertical median' then just has equation x=a.
 
Ok, so I tried to put the both of your ideas into my problem by trying to parametrize the equation. If I can find out the parametric equations of all the altitudes, then I can easily find out if they intersect by setting them equal to each other. Then i found out that I have no information about where the altitudes intersect its corresponding side. hmm... But what matt grime is saying is that i do know information about the vertical median, and that is x = a. Could you please explaing that thought? what are you calling x here?
 
Underlying this question is an important identity involving the cross-product. (No coordinates needed.)
 
so... I know that aXb is orthognal to both a and b, but I don't see how that plays in here.
 
robphy said:
Underlying this question is an important identity involving the cross-product. (No coordinates needed.)

while working out another problem that I thought might help me with this problem, I think I might have found something along the lines you are talking about. This other proof asks me to prove the law of sines vectorally. So...

First, I stated that a+b+c=0 for a triangle made up of three vectors, a, b, and c. Each side has a corresponding angle of A, B, or C.

I then took the cross product of aX (a+b+c) = aXa=0.

I then took the cross product of bX (a+b+c) = bXb=0.

I then took the cross product of cX (a+b+c) = cXc=0.

From here I then made the statement that if the above was all true, then aXa + bXb + cXc = 0, so

|a||a|sin(A) + |b||b|sin(B) + |c||c|sin(C) = 0 as well. Now I can really see this getting close to the law of sines (althought I am not too sure how to get it there from here).

So, |a||a|sin(A) = |b||b|sin(B) = |c||c|sin(C)

Maybe there is some way to apply this towards the above triangle problem?
 
Last edited:
prace said:
Ok, so I tried to put the both of your ideas into my problem by trying to parametrize the equation. If I can find out the parametric equations of all the altitudes, then I can easily find out if they intersect by setting them equal to each other. Then i found out that I have no information about where the altitudes intersect its corresponding side. hmm... But what matt grime is saying is that i do know information about the vertical median, and that is x = a. Could you please explaing that thought? what are you calling x here?

x,y as in x-y plane, just standard coordinates.

as for not knowing the equations of the altitudes... well, you know a point the line goes through, and you know something it is perpendicular too, so you can write down the equation.
 
prace said:
while working out another problem that I thought might help me with this problem, I think I might have found something along the lines you are talking about. This other proof asks me to prove the law of sines vectorally. So...

First, I stated that a+b+c=0 for a triangle made up of three vectors, a, b, and c. Each side has a corresponding angle of A, B, or C.

and now if you use the vector equation of a line (using the cross product), you're done in a line or two. this is the coordinate free suggestion above.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K