Proving the limit (epsilon delta) #3

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a limit using the epsilon-delta definition, specifically the limit as x approaches 8 for the function sqrt(x + 1) equating to 3. Participants are exploring the formal requirements of the proof and the necessary conditions for the chosen delta.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's approach of working backwards from the desired conclusion and question the validity of the steps taken. There are inquiries about ensuring positivity in the inequalities used and clarifications on the correct expressions for the limit translation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's reasoning and suggesting that further validation of the chosen delta is necessary. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the steps taken in the proof are logically sound and that all assumptions are checked.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of confirming the positivity of terms involved in the inequalities and the potential errors in translating the limit into the epsilon-delta framework. There is a focus on the arithmetic properties relevant to the proof.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Prove the following states directly using the formal e, d definition

[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 8} \sqrt{x + 1} = 3[/tex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



If 0 < |x-8| < d
Then 0 < sqrt((x+1) - 3) < e

Let e be given
3 < sqrt(x+1) < e + 3
9 < x + 1 < e2 + 6e + 9
0 < x - 8 < e2 + 6e

This suggests we choose d = e2 + 6e
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you want comments on your work? I have three, of varying degrees of importance.


1. The work you've done here is "working backwards" -- you've started with what you wanted to happen, and worked backwards to try and find something that would ensure it.

Now, what you want to do is to show that this choice of d really does do what you want it to do.


2. When you did this step:
3 < sqrt(x+1) < e + 3
9 < x + 1 < e2 + 6e + 9
did you remember to make sure everything was positive? A relevant law of arithmetic is
If 0 < a < b then a² < b²​


3. Your translation from limit to e-d has an error.
 
Hurkyl said:
did you remember to make sure everything was positive? A relevant law of arithmetic is
If 0 < a < b then a² < b²​

3 < sqrt(x+1) < e + 3
9 < x + 1 < e2 + 6e + 9

Does this mean I need to show that sqrt(x+1) and e + 3 are positive?




Hurkyl said:
3. Your translation from limit to e-d has an error.

Are you talking about the sqrt((x+1) - 3)? It should be sqrt(x+1) + 3?
 
zeion said:
3 < sqrt(x+1) < e + 3
9 < x + 1 < e2 + 6e + 9

Does this mean I need to show that sqrt(x+1) and e + 3 are positive?
And 3. (But notice that if you can show 3 is positive, then it's very easy to show the other two are positive)

It's obvious enough in this case that you don't need to bother mentioning it in your work -- but I want to make sure that you know what you're doing when you apply steps like this.




Are you talking about the sqrt((x+1) - 3)? It should be sqrt(x+1) + 3?
"sqrt(x+1) - 3", actually.
 
Hurkyl said:
"sqrt(x+1) - 3", actually.

Yes I meant that sorry.


Hurkyl said:
Now, what you want to do is to show that this choice of d really does do what you want it to do.

So now I need to show that
if 0 < x - 8 < e^2 + 6e
then 0 < sqrt((x+1) - 3) < e
is true?
 
zeion said:
So now I need to show that
if 0 < x - 8 < e^2 + 6e
then 0 < sqrt((x+1) - 3) < e
is true?
(did you mean "|x-8|"?)

If you are still interested in finishing the e-d problem you originally wrote down, then yes that is what you need to do.

Sometimes it's possible to argue that all of your scratch work is reversible -- but it's probably not worth trying to do so until you become very comfortable with doing these arithmetic proofs involving inequalities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K