Proving the Metric Property of d(x,y)=|x3-y3) for a Given Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the function d(x,y)=|x³-y³| satisfies the properties of a metric, specifically focusing on the triangle inequality. Participants are exploring whether to provide a proof or counterexample to demonstrate the validity of the metric properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of proving the triangle inequality and consider various cases based on the ordering of x, y, and z. There is also a suggestion to simplify the problem by assuming x ≤ y. Some participants reference the triangle inequality of the standard metric on the reals as a potential pathway for the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and suggestions on how to approach the proof. There is recognition that the problem may be simpler than initially thought, and some guidance has been provided regarding leveraging known inequalities.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of proving metric properties without providing complete solutions, and there is an emphasis on not spoiling the question for others. The discussion reflects a focus on the triangle inequality specifically.

mynameisfunk
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove that the given function is a metric, or give a counterexample to show how it fails to be a metric: d(x,y)=|x3-y3|

Homework Equations



ok, out of the 3 requirements to be a metric, 2 are trivial. The third is to prove the triangle inequality holds: d(x,y)[tex]\leq[/tex]d(x,z)+d(z,y)

should i just go through the different cases of x<y<z , x<z<y , z<x<y?? and if the inequality holds true for all of them I am done? I feel like there must be a better way to take care of this... Oh, and please don't spoil the question for me. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you have written the inequality to prove, you may assume [itex]x \leq y[/itex] since otherwise you can just switch the positions of the two variables. You still have to consider further cases but this should simplify the problem slightly.
 
since i already have that |x-y|[tex]\leq[/tex]|x-z|+|z-y| is a metric space, there must be a real direct way to show this holds true also right?
 
Yes, well precisely that is the triangle inequality for the usual metric on the reals. You're still working with the usual metric on R, so try to use the same triangle inequality you just wrote, except with each variable replaced by its cube.
 
I don't see another case other than the 3 in my first post assuming that x[tex]\leq[/tex]y
 
mynameisfunk said:
I don't see another case other than the 3 in my first post assuming that x[tex]\leq[/tex]y

There's no cases necessary. snipez90 already told you how to do it directly. This is a LOT easier than you think it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K