Proving the Nilpotency of Square Triangular Matrices with Zero Diagonal Entries

  • Thread starter Thread starter redyelloworange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Any square triangular matrix with zero diagonal entries is nilpotent, as established in the discussion. The participants explored alternative methods to prove this property without relying on the assumption that the eigenvalues of a nilpotent operator are all zero. Through examples, it was observed that as the matrix is raised to higher powers, zeros shift towards the top-right corner, supporting the conjecture. The discussion emphasizes that the minimal polynomial of such matrices is x^n, confirming their nilpotency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of square triangular matrices
  • Knowledge of nilpotent operators
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and minimal polynomials
  • Basic matrix multiplication techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of nilpotent matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of eigenvalues in matrix theory
  • Explore the concept of minimal polynomials in depth
  • Investigate advanced matrix multiplication techniques and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of triangular matrices and nilpotent operators.

redyelloworange
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that any square triangular matrix with each diagonal entry equal to zero is nilpotent

The Attempt at a Solution


Drawing out the matrix and multiplying seems a little tedious. Perhaps there is a better way?
Is there another way to do this without assuming that the eigenvalues of a nilpotent operator are all 0?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might not be the easiest way, but trying a few examples shows that as you raise the matrix to higher powers, the zeros creep up towards the top-right corner one space at a time. This suggests trying to prove a stronger result, that if Aij=0 for i>j-k and Bij=0 for i>j-l, then (AB)ij=0 for i>j-k-l (or something like that).
 
Last edited:
Since it is triangular with zero diagonal you know the eigenvalues are all 0, thus you know the min poly is x^n for some n. Why are you 'assuming' that the eigenvalues of a nilpotent operator are all 0? It is clearly true (over a field), and isn't important for this question, really (you state you don't want to assume nilpotent implies all e-values 0, but we actually need all e-values 0 implies nilpotent).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K