Proving the Non-negativity Property of a Diffusion Equation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter modeiry88
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the non-negativity property of a solution to a diffusion equation, specifically examining the behavior of the function \( u(x,t) \) under given boundary and initial conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for an attempt at a solution, with one participant proposing an identity related to the diffusion equation. There is a suggestion to correct the identity and substitute the partial differential equation (PDE) into it.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem. There is an emphasis on correcting the proposed identity and integrating the resulting expressions, but no consensus or resolution has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin the problem, and there are reminders about forum rules regarding showing work. The discussion includes a focus on the implications of the diffusion equation's properties.

modeiry88
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let u(x,t) satisfy


Homework Equations




([tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]t) = ([tex]\partial[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]x[tex]^{2}[/tex])...(0<x<1,t>0)

u(0,t)=u(1,t)=0...(t[tex]\geq[/tex]0)

u(x,0)=f(x)...(o[tex]\leq[/tex]x[tex]\leq[/tex]1),

where f[tex]\in[/tex]C[0.1] show that for any T[tex]\geq[/tex]0

[tex]\int[/tex] from 0..1 (u(x,T))[tex]^{2}[/tex]dx [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] from 0..1 (f(x))[tex]^{2}[/tex]dx


The Attempt at a Solution



not sure
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's 3 posts and no work shown on anyone of them. You *must* show an attempt at a solution, or we cannot be of help to you. Please click on the "Rules" link at the top of the page.
 
im sorry, I am obviously knew to this forum...

For this problem, I am trying to use the identity as follows

2u(([tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]t)-([tex]\partial[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]x[tex]^{2}[/tex])) = ([tex]\partial[/tex]u[tex]^{2}[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]t)-([tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]x)*(u*([tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]x))+2*([tex]\partial[/tex]u/[tex]\partial[/tex]x)[tex]^{2}[/tex]
 
It's a diffusion equation, so you might expect this sort of behavior. Your 'identity' is a little messed up. Can you fix it? Once you've done that substitute the PDE in. You should be able to show that ((u^2),t)/2-(u*(u,x)),x=(-(u,x)^2)<=0. I'm using commas for partial derivatives, forgive my laziness. Now integrate dx between 0 and 1. Can you show the (u*(u,x)),x term vanishes? Once you have integal (u^2),t<=0 you are home free.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K