Proving the scaling property of the Delta function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The scaling property of the Delta function is proven as \(\delta(at) = \frac{1}{|a|}\delta(t)\). This is established by evaluating the integral \(\int \phi(t) \delta(at) dt\) and substituting \(u = at\), leading to the conclusion that \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \phi\left(\frac{x}{a}\right) \delta(x) d\frac{x}{a} = \frac{1}{a} \phi(0)\). The absolute value of \(a\) is necessary to account for the transformation of integration boundaries when \(a < 0\), ensuring the limits remain consistent. The proof highlights the importance of recognizing constants in integration and the behavior of the Delta function under scaling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in integrals
  • Concept of absolute values in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Delta function in detail
  • Learn about integration techniques involving variable substitution
  • Explore the implications of absolute values in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate applications of the Delta function in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physicists, and engineers who are working with distributions and integrals, particularly those focusing on the properties of the Delta function and its applications in various fields.

caesius
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that \delta(at)=\frac{1}{abs(a)}\delta(t)

Hint: Show that \int\phi(t)\delta(at)dt=\frac{1}{abs(a)}\phi(0)

(the limits of integration are from -inf to +inf btw, I couldn't find how to put them in..)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. I understand that the integral is only defined for at = 0, i.e., t = 0. But if I follow this logical then I evaluate the integral to be phi(0), not phi(0)/a. Where does the a come from?

And I'm not entirely sure how proving that relationship helps with the proof of the scaling function...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That trick only works when the argument to the delta is the bare integration variable.
So try substituting u = a t, so you get something like
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \delta(u) \, du = f(0)
(and click the formula to see how I did the boundaries)
 
Ok I've substituted x = at, now I get

<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\phi(\frac{x}{a})\delta(x)d\frac{x}{a} = \frac{1}{a}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\phi(\frac{x}{a})\delta(x)dx = \frac{1}{a}\phi(\frac{0}{a}) = \frac{1}{a}\phi(0)<br />

I don't quite see how I'm allowed to take the 1/a out of the d/dx operater and put it at the front though. And why should it be the abs(a) not a?

And I still can't see how this helps prove anything.

Cheers, Benjamin
 
You are allowed to take the a outside, because it is just a constant: du = a dt, so dt = (1/a) du, and you can put constants outside the integration as in
\int \tfrac12 x^2 \, dx = \tfrac12 \int x^2 \, dx

The absolute value of a comes from transforming the integration boundaries. If a < 0, then -infinity goes to +infinity in the transformed integral, and vice versa. However, in the final formula you simply want -infinity to be the lower boundary, and +infinity as the upper boundary. So if a < 0 you have to swap them, at the cost of a minus sign, whereas for a > 0 you don't. Do you have to multiply the whole thing by sgn(a), and then you can shorten sgn(a) / a to 1/abs(a).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K