Proving Uniform Continuity for f+g on X

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the sum of two uniformly continuous functions, f and g, defined on a set X, is also uniformly continuous. The proof utilizes the properties of uniformly continuous functions, specifically leveraging the epsilon-delta definition. By establishing that for any epsilon > 0, there exists a delta > 0 such that the combined distance between f and g remains less than epsilon, the conclusion is reached that f + g is uniformly continuous. The discussion emphasizes the importance of rigor in mathematical writing and adherence to forum rules regarding solution sharing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniformly continuous functions
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Basic knowledge of Lipschitz continuity
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and symbols
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lipschitz continuous functions
  • Explore the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in depth
  • Learn about the implications of uniform continuity in analysis
  • Review rigorous mathematical writing techniques
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis, particularly those studying continuity and its properties in function theory.

CarmineCortez
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




if f and g are 2 uniformly continuous functions on X --> R

show that f+g is uniformly continuous on X



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried showing that f+g is Lipschitz because all Lipschitz functions are uniformly continuous.

So i end up with d(x_1,x_2) < delta then d([f(x1)+g(x1)],[f(x2)+g(x2)])<epsilon. how can I show this is lipshcitz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forget about lipschitz

you know that if you pick x1 and x2 close to each other, then fx1 and fx2 are at most a distance close to each other, namely epsilon. And also gx1 and gx2 are at most a distance epsilon. so their summed distance is 2 *epsilon.

so now you can define epsilon' as 2epsilon... so for any distance delta between x1 and x2 you now have a distance epsilon' between f+gx1 and f+gx2, that upholds that "for any epsilon' >0 there is a delta >0 such that the distance between x1 and x2 <delta implies that the distance between f+gx1 and f+gx2 is smaller than epsilon' "... it's just the same delta as before.

or at least that's what I make of it. It's 1 AM here and I can't finish my own problem so I went to look at other peoples' problems... but I don't have a clear mind right now.

Oh yeah, and when you write this down... you'll want to use nice math symbols and make things a bit more rigorous... but I think that should be no problem.
 
Last edited:
Let e>0 be given. Since f(x) is uniformly continuous on X, there exists s > 0, such that y in neighborhood of x, N_s (x), implies |f(y)-f(x)| < e/2. Similarly, since g(x) uniformly continuous, y in N_s (x) implies |g(y) - g(x)| < e/2. Since |f(y)+g(y) - f(x)-g(x)| <= |f(y) - f(x)| + |g(y) - g(x)| < e/2 + e/2, we have |(f+g)(y) - (f+g)(x)| < e, for all y in N_s (x). That is (f+g) uniformly continuous, this completes the proof.
 
I don't think we're supposed to write out the entire answer like that
 
jacobrhcp said:
I don't think we're supposed to write out the entire answer like that

VERY DEFINITELY NOT. It's against the forum rules. "Under no circumstances should complete solutions be provided to a questioner, whether or not an attempt has been made." Don't do that again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K