Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 26,254
- 623
estro said:[tex]\mbox {Let } \epsilon<0,\ x_0 \in [a,b][/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_n(x)=f'(x)\ \Rightarrow\ \forall\ n>N\ |f_n(x_0)-f'(x_0)|< \frac {\epsilon}{3} \mbox { (*1)}[/tex]
[tex]f_n(x) \mbox { is continuous in R } \Rightarrow\ \forall\ |x-x_0|< \delta_n,\ |f_n(x)-f_n(x_0)|< \frac {\epsilon}{3} \mbox { (*2)}[/tex]
[tex]f'(x) \mbox { is continuous in R } \Rightarrow\ \forall\ |x-x_0|< \delta,\ |f'(x_0)-f'(x)|< \frac {\epsilon}{3} \mbox { (*3)}[/tex]
[tex]t_n=\min \{\delta_n, \delta \}[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow\ \mbox {(*1) and (*2) and (*3) } \Rightarrow\ \forall\ |x-x_0|< t_n[/tex]
[tex]|f_n(x)-f'(x)|=|f_n(x)-f_n(x_0)+f_n(x_0)-f'(x_0)+f'(x_0)-f'(x)| \leq |f_n(x)-f_n(x_0)|+|f_n(x_0)-f'(x_0)|+|f'(x_0)-f'(x)|< \frac {\epsilon}{3}+\frac {\epsilon}{3}+\frac {\epsilon}{3}<\epsilon[/tex]
I have hard time to get sound intuition about this because the neighborhood around x is not fixed [changes for every n], and this makes me uncomfortable.
Now I'm trying to think about this. I'm not familiar with compactness theorem. [But I think Weierstrass Theorem can also help]
I have an idea now to play with [tex]t_n= \{x\ |\ \max_{[a,b]} |f_n(x)-f'(x)|\}[/tex], like I did with [tex]\mbox {x_0}[/tex] in the above proof.
You are absolutely right to be worried about the n dependence. Suppose you could show |f_n(x)-f_n(y)|<=M*|x-y| for some constant M, independent of n. Would that help?