Proving various properties of complex numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the identity (1/z)* = 1/(z*), where z* is the complex conjugate of z. Participants emphasize that while the relationship seems straightforward, a formal proof is necessary. The complex conjugate of z = x + iy is defined as z* = x - iy, leading to the conclusion that 1/(x + iy) should equal 1/(x - iy). However, it's highlighted that one cannot assume the identity without proper algebraic manipulation, suggesting that the proof should involve separating the real and imaginary parts of the expression. The consensus is that a rigorous algebraic approach is essential to validate the proof.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



This problem is very easy, but I'm not sure how best to "prove" it. This part of the question just states:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) where z* is the complex conjugate of z.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So the complex conjugate of z = x + iy is defined is z* = x - iy. That is, the complex conjugate of something is just making the complex part the opposite sign. So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.

The answer seems far too straight forward to warrant some formal "proof" but as the question is asking for a proof, I was wondering how you would go about doing it? For previous parts of this problem, such as proving that z* = re-i\theta, I could prove by graphing z and z* in the complex plane, then using Euler's identity of sines and cosines to rewrite those terms in terms of exponential functions and "prove" that way. However, I'm not sure how to "prove" this part of the problem as it seems way too straight forward.

Thanks for any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



This problem is very easy, but I'm not sure how best to "prove" it. This part of the question just states:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) where z* is the complex conjugate of z.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So the complex conjugate of z = x + iy is defined is z* = x - iy. That is, the complex conjugate of something is just making the complex part the opposite sign. So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.

The answer seems far too straight forward to warrant some formal "proof" but as the question is asking for a proof, I was wondering how you would go about doing it? For previous parts of this problem, such as proving that z* = re-i\theta, I could prove by graphing z and z* in the complex plane, then using Euler's identity of sines and cosines to rewrite those terms in terms of exponential functions and "prove" that way. However, I'm not sure how to "prove" this part of the problem as it seems way too straight forward.

Thanks for any advice.

I don't think you have to graph anything. By using z and z* in rectangular form, you should be able to establish the stated identity algebraically.
 
Yosty22 said:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) ...So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.
You are assuming what you are trying to prove here.
I would recommend algebraically showing that ## \frac {1}{x-iy}=\left(\frac {1}{x+iy}\right)^* ## by separating the latter into its real and imaginary parts.
 
To elaborate on what RUber said, all you can really assume as far as conjugation goes is ##(u+iv)^* = u-iv##. ##1/(x+iy)## isn't of the form ##u+iv##, so you can't simply replace ##iy## with ##-iy## and claim it's equal to the conjugate.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K