Pulley connects 2 masses, problem with inertia to accelleration calculation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 3K views
satisf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given is the setup in the attachment, I think the values speak for itself. Additionally, there is a friction coefficient of 0.36 that works in on the 2 blocks.

attachment.php?attachmentid=29993&d=1290281397.png


So in short: 2 masses (1 one a slope), connected through a pulley, that does have friction and to complete it, the ground has friction to.

Asked:
a) Accelleration of blocks (0.309m/s2)
b) Tension in both cords (7.67N and 9.22N)

I actually got quite far, I even know what I am missing in my own derivation, a factor of 2 (will explain below). But I can't manage to see why. It's in the derivation for a, a to b Is no problem.


Homework Equations


[tex]F=ma[/tex]

[tex]\tau=RFsin(\theta)[/tex]

[tex]\sum \tau = I\alpha[/tex]

[tex]a_t=r\alpha[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Using free-body calculations I found expressions for T1 (left block) and T2 (right block), as follows:

[tex]T_1=m_1a+0.36m_1g[/tex]
[tex]T_2=-m_2a+m_2g\mathrm{cos}(\frac{\pi}{3})-0.36m_2g\mathrm{sin}(\frac{\pi}{3})[/tex]

I'm quite sure that these are correct, since substituting the solution for a in these gives me the correct tensions.

Now to bring in the pulley I started with this:
[tex]\sum \tau = I\alpha=I\frac{a}{R}=MR^2\frac{A}{R}=MRa[/tex]

Then, knowing that [tex]\tau_1=RT_1\mathrm{sin}(\theta_1)[/tex] and [tex]\tau_2=RT_2\mathrm{sin}(\theta_2)[/tex] and both sinuses will equal one I get to:

[tex]RF_1+RF_2=MRa[/tex]
or the more familiar
[tex]F_1+F_2=Ma[/tex]

But this is where things go wrong, as far as I know it should be [tex]\frac{M}{2}[/tex] on the right hand side. And yes, when I do put in a factor of 2 I get the correct solution.

So now my question is: where the hell in my derivation did I forget the factor?

P.S. while previewing this post the latex got messed up, If it's not solved in final submit, can some moderator adjust it?
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 737
on Phys.org
Allright, the error was of course that for a disk [tex]I=\frac{MR^2}{2}[/tex]. I relied to blindly on the formulaium i got. [tex]I=mr²[/tex] is for point masses, so for a disk you get following equation for I:

[ŧex]I=int_0^\pi int_0^R \frac{M}{\pi r^2} r^2 r \mathrm{d}r\mathrm{d}\theta = \ldots = \frac{MR^2}{2}[/tex]

Note the extra r is of course because the equation is in polar coordinates and the division by [tex]\pi r^2[/tex] is of course to get the uniform mass distribution.

If you use this formulah in my original post, everything is correct.