And what the difference between waves and pulses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics user1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulse Wave Waves
Click For Summary
Pulses are defined as localized disturbances that have a finite extent in space and time, while waves are continuous oscillations. A pulse can consist of one or more complete wavelengths, but it is characterized by its abrupt start and stop, which indicates a complex frequency content. Both examples discussed illustrate different types of pulses rather than continuous waves. Pulsed waves can be created by combining multiple sinusoidal waves of varying frequencies. The distinction lies in the nature of their propagation and the characteristics of their frequency content.
physics user1
In images I always seen pulses as a part of a wave corresponding to an half of a piece of wave, but it is called still a pulse when we have a part with a complete wavelength? I mean this (in the photo)

And what the difference between waves and pulses?

What I think is that is still a pulse because a wave is a non stoping oscillation, not just one
 

Attachments

  • 1451665265899-670310684.jpg
    1451665265899-670310684.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 635
Physics news on Phys.org
A pulse is a form of wave. In particular, it's called pulse, usually because it has finite extent in space and time - it's oscillating and propagating, but confined within certain spatial extent at any given time. So, in this regard, both situations you drew there describe two different pulses. You can build a pulsed wave by superposing many sinusoidal waves of different frequencies. For example, try plotting ##\sum_{k=1}^10 \sin k\omega x##, you should see that this function takes the form a repeated pulses which also oscillates along.
 
I would call the first one a doublet and the second one a pulse. The difference from a wave is the abrupt start and stop that implies a very complicated frequency content. Usually the doublet and the pulse are in the form of steps, but I would still guess that the frequency content of your examples are closer to the doublet / pulse than to a continuous wave.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K