Purified filtered water pitcher worse than regular water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppppparker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regular Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness and safety of using a filtered water pitcher compared to regular tap water. Participants explore various aspects of water filtration, including health implications, maintenance of filters, and personal experiences with different brands and types of water filtration systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about whether the filtered water pitcher does more harm than good, particularly in light of a warning sticker regarding proper usage.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of replacing filters as specified by the manufacturer to avoid issues such as bacterial growth.
  • There is a question about whether filtered water is safer or healthier than tap water, with one participant asserting that it provides an additional layer of filtration.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of certain brands, with one noting that they prefer a different brand due to its more advanced filtration stages and built-in testing features.
  • One participant mentions geographical differences, suggesting that in certain locations, such as the Swiss Alps, tap water may be preferable to filtered water.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for filters to remove beneficial minerals from the water.
  • Another participant questions the overall effectiveness of water filters, citing issues like low contact time with filter surfaces and the variety of contaminants present.
  • Personal anecdotes about drinking spring water in Bali highlight differing perspectives on water quality and filtration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness and safety of filtered water versus tap water. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the necessity and efficacy of water filtration systems.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of geographic context in evaluating water quality, and there are unresolved questions about the impact of filtration on mineral content and the effectiveness of different filtration systems.

ppppparker
Messages
18
Reaction score
4
I bought a water pitcher that purifies water. It supposedly filters out a lot of contaminants like lead. (It doesn't filter out fluoride but I knew this before I got it)
It came with a little warning sticker saying that its important to use the product as specified, other wise you will be at risk of contaminants.
So now I'm wondering if these filter systems do more harm than good. Does anyone have experience about this?
fyi I'm just talking about a water pitcher with a filter mechanism in it, which I use when I'm at school, this isn't like a water purification "system" or anything .. its just a cheapo $20 filtered water pitcher I got on amazon (its pretty popular).
Do you think I'm making big deal out of the warning sticker it came with? or what? thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The problem with these devices (and I've had Brita for years till recently) is that you MUST replace the filters as required by the manufacturer. Otherwise, the charcoal activation, or whatever the mechanism they use to clean the water, will not be useful beyond a certain number of usage or period of time. Then, depending on your usage, the filter might be a harbor for bacteria, etc.

If you use it according to the instruction, then there isn't a problem.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
yup that's the same brand I got its a "Brita Everyday Water Filter Pitcher, 10 Cup". I get what your saying about filter.. if you don't replace it then the filter is pointless. But also my general question is do you think using this filtered water is safer or healthier than water that comes out of the faucet? you said you used Brita for years until recently, so has your opinion changed about filtered water or are britas not very good or something? thanks
 
ppppparker said:
do you think using this filtered water is safer or healthier than water that comes out of the faucet?

Absolutely, it offers an extra layer of filtering over the water treatment done in the municipal plants. I don't think the FDA would approve their sale if they lowered the quality of the water. Even if they didn't improve the quality of the water, I would use a pitcher filter anyway because drinking water straight from my tap makes me want to barf. Once you get used to filtered water, the straight tap is disgusting.

ppppparker said:
britas not very good or something?

I'm not very impressed with Brita myself, but it's better than nothing. I use zero water exclusively. It's a 5 stage filter instead of Brita's 2 stage filter, I think, plus it has a device to measure the concentrations of "dissolved solids," which indicates when to change the filter. I don't think the Brita has a tester, which means you have to guess when to change it. As ZapperZ said, the important thing to be vigilant of if you don't want the filter to end up working against you at some point is to change it when it's time to do so.

http://www.naturalnews.com/046536_water_filters_heavy_metals_lab_results.html
 
DiracPool said:
Absolutely, it offers an extra layer of filtering over the water treatment done in the municipal plants.
Depends on where you are. Being in the Swiss Alpes it's probably better to drink the water as it flows out of the faucet.
I always wonder if those filters also extract all the minerals which we need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
fresh_42 said:
Depends on where you are. Being in the Swiss Alpes it's probably better to drink the water as it flows out of the faucet.

Well, if you're fortunate enough to live here, I think you may be an exception...

Drinking-water.jpg


For the rest of us, though, I'd suggest getting a zero water filter..:oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mostafa1978
I always thought that those water filters were, uh, ineffective. The rate of flow is too high. The percentage of the water that actually comes in contact with the filter surface is low. Also, the variety of contaminants is large.

I suspect that most people don't replace the filters very often.

When backpacking and so forth I use a water filter to get rid of bacteria, but that's easy because bacteria are so big.

In Bali I lived next to a spring and drank water straight out of the ground. It tasted SO good. Holy water is a very big deal in Bali. Indeed, I suspect that this was one of the main things that attracted settlers: the prevalence of springs as a source of pure water. They're everywhere. There are two ancient craters that serve as natural reservoirs and the water filters many a mile through the soft, porous rock.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mostafa1978

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
43
Views
23K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
44K