What is the Purpose of Black Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Willowz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the philosophical question of whether black holes have an inherent purpose. Participants argue that attributing purpose to black holes implies the existence of an intelligent creator, which contradicts scientific reasoning. The conversation emphasizes that such inquiries are unscientific and often lead to endless, unresolvable questions. It is suggested that the concept of purpose is irrelevant in the context of scientific exploration. Ultimately, the dialogue concludes that discussing the purpose of black holes is more philosophical than scientific.
Willowz
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
A little philosophical question.

What would you say is the purpose of a black hole? To create another universe? To somehow balance the distribution of mass? Any guesses or hunches? Just curious.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The idea that black holes (or any other sort of astronomical object) would have some kind of inherent purpose that we can identify seems absurd to me.
 
the purpose of a black hole is to get itself talked about :frown:

if we ignore them, they won't bother us :smile:
 
nicksauce said:
The idea that black holes (or any other sort of astronomical object) would have some kind of inherent purpose that we can identify seems absurd to me.
Why?
 
tiny-tim said:
the purpose of a black hole is to get itself talked about :frown:

if we ignore them, they won't bother us :smile:
This is unfortunate. I don't want to ignore them.
 
Willowz said:
Why?

Why should it have a purpose?
 
For something to have a purpose posits the existence of an intelligent "creator". In this reasoning it would be a God, which holds no value in scientific research.
 
Pengwuino said:
Why should it have a purpose?
Because it exists.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
For something to have a purpose posits the existence of an intelligent "creator". In this reasoning it would be a God, which holds no value in scientific research.
No, none of that. Please.
 
  • #10
What do you mean? My reasoning isn't flawed, in fact, it completely negates your point, ultimately making it an unscientific idea.
 
  • #11
Kevin_Axion said:
What do you mean? My reasoning isn't flawed, in fact, it completely negates your point, ultimately making it an unscientific idea.
Maybe, but it doesn't make any sense. So, I see no reason to bring it up.
 
  • #12
How does it not make sense? Firstly, your initial question is arbitrary because the level of reasoning is limited to scientific questions. Asking why something exists holds a great level of uncertainty and probability for error. If I were to ask the common question "Why do electrical charges repel and attract based on them being either positive or negative?" no one would be able to answer your question scientifically. This then exists in the realm of philosophy because as Feynman states asking why questions is pointless, they continue ad infinitum without any reasonable progress in one's understanding.
 
  • #13
This is an unscientific conversation. The idea of "purpose" is not relevant to science. Locked.
 
Back
Top