PV Graph Question: Internal Energy Not Zero?

Thread starter bluesteels
Start date Feb 2, 2022
Tags

Graph Physcis

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the internal energy of a gas in a PV graph, particularly in the context of a process from state a to state b. It is noted that while the gas returns to its original state, the internal energy is not necessarily zero for the specific process being analyzed. The focus is on understanding that internal energy depends on the state of the system, not just the path taken. Clarification is provided that the question pertains only to the process from a to b, which may involve changes in energy despite the gas returning to its original state. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing the specific process rather than assuming zero internal energy based solely on the initial and final states.

Feb 2, 2022

bluesteels

Homework Statement: The idealized cycle shown is known as the Otto cycle. (Figure 1)Suppose an engine is executing this Otto cycle, using a gas (not necessarily ideal) as its working substance. From state A to state B, the gas is allowed to expand adiabatically. (An adiabatic process is one in which no heat is added to, or given off by, the working gas.) The gas is then cooled at constant volume until it reaches state C, at which point it is adiabatically compressed to state D. Finally, it is heated at constant volume until it returns to state A.

Relevant Equations: adiabactic delta u = -w

isothermal Q=W

Figure 1:

Screen Shot 2022-02-03 at 12.04.03 AM.png

im so confused on why is the internal energy not zero for the 2nd picture because i thought if the gas returning to its original states so it zero

Screen Shot 2022-02-03 at 12.02.43 AM.png

Physics news on Phys.org

Feb 2, 2022

haruspex

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Insights Author

Gold Member

2024 Award

bluesteels said:

i thought if the gas returning to its original states so it zero

The question only asks about process ##a\rightarrow b##.

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

View full post »

Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...

View full post »