PV^lamba=constant in an isentropic Flow

  • Thread starter Thread starter jb95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Isentropic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the ideal gas law (Pv = (1/M)RT) and the adiabatic process equation (Pv^λ = constant) in isentropic flow scenarios. Participants clarify that knowing the pressure and temperature at a specific point allows for the determination of specific volume using the ideal gas law without needing the adiabatic expression. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding thermodynamic principles, particularly the relationship between pressure, temperature, and specific volume in ideal gases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (Pv = (1/M)RT)
  • Knowledge of isentropic processes in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of specific volume
  • Basic principles of thermodynamic state variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the ideal gas law in various thermodynamic processes
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the adiabatic process equation (Pv^λ = constant)
  • Investigate the relationship between intensive variables in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the specific heat ratios and their role in isentropic flow
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in fluid dynamics or gas flow analysis will benefit from this discussion.

jb95
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if a gas expands isentropically (consider the process reversible adiabatic), from point 1 in a nozzle to point 2 downstream of the nozzle. If you know the pressure and temperature at point 1, can you use the relationship pv=1/M RT to work out the specific volume at point 1? And similarly if you know pressure at point 2 and temp at point 2, can you use Pv= 1/M RT to work v2? Or do you have to use the equation Pv^lamba = constant. The thing is you don't know the constant here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jb95 said:
if a gas expands isentropically (consider the process reversible adiabatic), from point 1 in a nozzle to point 2 downstream of the nozzle. If you know the pressure and temperature at point 1, can you use the relationship pv=1/M RT to work out the specific volume at point 1? And similarly if you know pressure at point 2 and temp at point 2, can you use Pv= 1/M RT to work v2? Or do you have to use the equation Pv^lamba = constant. The thing is you don't know the constant here.
If ax = b and you know a and b, do you have enough information to determine x?

If Pv=MRT, and you know P, T, and R, do you have enough information to determine (v/M)?
 
Chestermiller said:
If ax = b and you know a and b, do you have enough information to determine x?

If Pv=MRT, and you know P, T, and R, do you have enough information to determine (v/M)?
You were NOT helpful at all with that silly answer. I don't know why you bothered replying. All I am asking is can you use pv=(1/M)RT to determine specific volume at either points 1 or do you have to use the adiabatic expression Pv^lamba. Clearly this is not your area!
 
I'm sending you a Warning with infraction points for insulting another member, namely me. I happen to be an expert in thermodynamics, but also in mathematics. You may not be familiar with how we do things here at Physics Forums. Let me fill you in. Our goal is to help you solve your own problem, not just give you the answer. We do this by giving you hints and asking you leading questions so that you can work through the answer by yourself. There was a reason I asked you these specific leading questions. Please have some patience and reconsider the questions I asked you.

If I get another response like the previous one you sent, you will be banned from Physics Forums.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Doc Al and Mark44
jb95 said:
if a gas expands isentropically (consider the process reversible adiabatic), from point 1 in a nozzle to point 2 downstream of the nozzle. If you know the pressure and temperature at point 1, can you use the relationship pv=1/M RT to work out the specific volume at point 1? And similarly if you know pressure at point 2 and temp at point 2, can you use Pv= 1/M RT to work v2? Or do you have to use the equation Pv^lamba = constant. The thing is you don't know the constant here.
In addition to what Chet already said, your post is deserving of a warning all by itself. Homework questions must be posted using the homework template, which you apparently deleted. Since Chet already dinged you with a heavy (and well deserved, IMO) infraction, I won't add to it this time...
 
Chestermiller said:
I'm sending you a Warning with infraction points for insulting another member, namely me. I happen to be an expert in thermodynamics, but also in mathematics. You may not be familiar with how we do things here at Physics Forums. Let me fill you in. Our goal is to help you solve your own problem, not just give you the answer. We do this by giving you hints and asking you leading questions so that you can work through the answer by yourself. There was a reason I asked you these specific leading questions. Please have some patience and reconsider the questions I asked you.

If I get another response like the previous one you sent, you will be banned from Physics Forums.

I apologise but this does not detract from the fact your response was not helpful. I would not consider it a leading question. I do appreciate the significance of leading question but that is not what it was. Anyway, I have figured it out, but thanks for at least posting a reply. I would also request you to read people's post carefully before answering, as then your answers would be more helpful. My question wasn't to do with being able to find vM by knowing P, R and T. You can have a look at it again if you want to, but it is not necessary for me at this point.
 
Your main question was: If you know the pressure and temperature at point 1, can you use the relationship pv=1/M RT to work out the specific volume at point 1?

It takes two intensive variables to establish the thermodynamic state of a system. If you know any two of these three (pressure, temperature, specific volume), you have enough information to uniquely determine the third one using the equation of state, in this case, the ideal gas law. My point was that if you know pressure and temperature of an ideal gas, you can always use the ideal gas law to uniquely determine the specific volume. You don't need another equation to do this. I was merely trying to help you figure this out on your own.

Chet
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jb95
Chestermiller said:
If ax = b and you know a and b, do you have enough information to determine x?

If Pv=MRT, and you know P, T, and R, do you have enough information to determine (v/M)?
Thank you, and again I am deeply sorry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
687
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K