Q: In a relative non-inertial reference frame, the fluid velocity is zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the fluid velocity in a relative non-inertial reference frame, specifically addressing why the term ##\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right)## equals zero in the momentum equation. The equation presented, $$\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int_{CV}^{}{u_{xyz}}\rho d\forall = M\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right) = 0$$, indicates that the fluid velocity is assumed to be constant for simplification. This assumption is crucial to eliminate the effects of changing fluid velocity as the cart's horizontal velocity increases, thereby maintaining a steady-state analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-inertial reference frames
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts
  • Knowledge of momentum equations in fluid mechanics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-inertial reference frames on fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the derivation and application of momentum equations in fluid mechanics
  • Explore the concept of control volumes in fluid analysis
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on fluid behavior in non-inertial systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for fluid mechanics students, researchers in applied physics, and engineers working with dynamic fluid systems, particularly those dealing with non-inertial reference frames.

tracker890 Source h
Messages
90
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
It's not apparent why the fluid velocity in the relative non-inertial reference frame is zero.
Relevant Equations
Momentum equation in non-inertial coordinates
Q: Regarding item (4), my understanding aligns with (eq_1), where M is a constant. However, why does ##\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right)## in (eq_1) equal 0?

$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int_{CV}^{}{u_{xyz}}\rho d\forall =\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left( u_{xyz}\cdot M \right) =M\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right) =0\cdots \text{(}eq\_1\text{)}
$$
reference
1701185080605.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that the reason for assumption 4 is to eliminate the reduction of fluid entering velocity as the cart increases its horizontal velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny and tracker890 Source h
Lnewqban said:
I believe that the reason for assumption 4 is to eliminate the reduction of fluid entering velocity as the cart increases its horizontal velocity.
Thank you for the explanation. So, for now, let's consider it as an assumption for simplifying the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
tracker890 Source h said:
Homework Statement: It's not apparent why the fluid velocity in the relative non-inertial reference frame is zero.
Relevant Equations: Momentum equation in non-inertial coordinates

Q: Regarding item (4), my understanding aligns with (eq_1), where M is a constant. However, why does ##\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right)## in (eq_1) equal 0?

$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int_{CV}^{}{u_{xyz}}\rho d\forall =\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left( u_{xyz}\cdot M \right) =M\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}u_{xyz} \right) =0\cdots \text{(}eq\_1\text{)}
$$
reference
What you have written here is incorrect. The integral term on the LHS of the governing equation from the example is what represents the solid mass ##M## momentum accumulation rate (when solid mass is contained inside the control volume - that is accelerating)
 

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
831
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K