Q is dense in R question about proof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A_B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof that the set of rational numbers, Q, is dense in the set of real numbers, R, as presented in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. Participants explore the nuances of the proof, particularly the existence of a specific integer m within the proof's context, and the implications of integer properties in relation to the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to conclude the existence of the integer m in the proof, expressing confusion about the necessary conditions for its existence.
  • Another participant suggests defining m as the minimum of a specific set of integers and raises questions about the non-emptiness of that set and the existence of a minimum.
  • There is a reference to the well-ordering principle, indicating its relevance to the discussion about integers.
  • A participant expresses a lack of understanding of integers and seeks recommendations for books that cover the topic adequately.
  • One participant asserts that every real number lies between two successive integers, suggesting a straightforward relationship between integers and irrational numbers.
  • A link to an alternative source is provided, which contains a different presentation of the same proof, implying that varied explanations may aid understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the proof and the properties of integers. There is no consensus on the clarity of the proof or the best approach to understanding the integers involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need to clarify foundational concepts related to integers and their properties, which may affect the understanding of the proof's validity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying real analysis, particularly those grappling with the concepts of density in the real numbers and the properties of integers.

A_B
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis there's the following proof that Q is dense in R.

Theorem: If x,y\in \mathbb{R} and x < y there exists a p \in \mathbb{Q} such that x<p<y.

Proof: Since x<y, we have y-x>0. It follow from the Archimedian property that there is a positive integer n such that
n(y-x)>1.
We again apply the Archimedian property to find positive integers m_1 a,d m_2 such that m_1>nx and m_2>-nx. Then
-m_2<nx<m_1.
Hence there is an integer m (with -m_2\leq m\leq m_1) such that
m-1\leq nx < m.
We combine the inequalities to get
nx < m \leq 1+nx < ny.
n is positive so
x < \frac{m}{n} < y.
Which proves that \mathbb{Q} is dense in \mathbb{R}.


How one concludes that the m in the red bit exists is what's troubling me.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, you're not the first one to ask that very question.

Anyway, the key is to define

m=\min\{k\in \mathbb{Z}~\vert~nx<k\}

However, there are some things we need to show:

- Does the minimum exist?? I.e. is the set \{k\in \mathbb{Z}~\vert~nx<k\} non-empty, does it have a lower bound? Why is the infimum a minimum?
- does m-1\leq nx<m hold.
 
i.e. are you aware of the well ordering principle?
 
Thanks for the replies, seems I don't know enough about integers yet, so I've been looking into them.
I've found another book on analysis which does introduce the integers, it defines them as "those real numbers which are in every inductive set."

But this isn't how the integers are usually introduced is it?

What's a good book to learn enough about integers (and maybe a little more)?

Thanks
 
This is self evident .Any real number must lie between two successive integers . When You have the natural number system ,Irrationals fill the gaps between any 2 successive integers . It's very simple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K