Quadratic air resistance clarification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical modeling of an object projected upwards under the influence of quadratic air resistance, specifically using Newton's second law and separation of variables to derive a differential equation. The integration process leads to an expression involving arctan, raising questions about the constant of integration, the sign change at the peak of the motion, and the relationship between time to reach the peak and initial velocity. Key insights include that the constant of integration is not included in definite integrals, and the sign change occurs due to evaluating the integral at different velocity boundaries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations and separation of variables
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, specifically involving arctan
  • Basic concepts of projectile motion and air resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in different contexts
  • Learn about solving differential equations with separation of variables
  • Explore the properties and applications of the arctan function in physics
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile motion in greater detail
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematicians, and engineers interested in understanding the dynamics of projectile motion and the effects of air resistance on trajectories.

penroseandpaper
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Please see screenshot
Relevant Equations
Please see screenshot
Hi all,

I've been trying to follow a question I came across on a website. And I'm able to understand everything up until the separation of variables for solving the differential equation and coming to a solution with arctan. But there are a few things that aren't explained that I was hoping somebody could shed some light on.

Right, so first, it's to do with an object that is projected upwards and has initial velocity greater than zero. Applying Newton's second law, the left hand side is m dv/dt and the left hand side has W+R; it's the quadratic expression for air resistance. Motion is upwards, and both forces act opposite (down). Dividing through by m leads to the differential equation found in the screenshots below.

Separation of variables means we can move the right hand side to the left (making it the denominator, under 1). And that can be integrated to result in the expression with arctan. Meanwhile, t is the result of integration on the right hand side. That's where I got up to without issue.

My first question is what happens to the constant of integration? I'm not exactly sure how to confirm if it has a value, given initial velocity is greater than zero. I know t=0 at this time, but I'm in a bit of a fuzz trying to balance the sides.

Second, why does the sign change at the top of the motion when v=0? Is that to do with changing the order of the boundaries?

And finally, why is time to the top of the motion equal to the positive solution of the integrand, with v0 in place of v?

Thank you for your help,
Penn
Screenshot_20201010-205231~2.png
Screenshot_20201010-205246~2.png
Screenshot_20201010-205258~2.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
penroseandpaper said:
My first question is what happens to the constant of integration? I'm not exactly sure how to confirm if it has a value, given initial velocity is greater than zero. I know t=0 at this time, but I'm in a bit of a fuzz trying to balance the sides.
You don't include a constant of integration in a definite integral.
penroseandpaper said:
Second, why does the sign change at the top of the motion when v=0? Is that to do with changing the order of the boundaries?
Your question is not very clear. By "why does the sign change..." I assume, but don't know for certain, that you are asking about why arctan shows up with a negative sign in the integral right after the first one in red.
The reason is that v = 0 and v0 is some positive number. So you evaluate the result expression at v = 0, and then subtract the value when v = v0.
penroseandpaper said:
And finally, why is time to the top of the motion equal to the positive solution of the integrand, with v0 in place of v?
t in the problem is the time when the projectile gets to the top of its path.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K