lasymphonie said:
Ah, I was under the impression that IBD hiring was a lot less at MIT than at other places because my boyfriend goes there and was shut down by the JPM people when he said he was interested in IBD...
P.S.: This is a long shot but I'm going to guess that you are in MA too... Wellesley?
synkk said:
Why those schools specifically? I mean, would you not hire someone from NYU or Berkeley just because he/she went there?
I'm sure other firms have their reasons, but I'll supply you with mine, as they are more circumstantial.
A few basic premises must be laid first: (1) the kind of firm that we run cannot get too large before cannibalizing ourselves, and (2) historically, graduates from these schools are more likely to end up in the top sell-side or buy-side firms, and eventually with the financial resources and experience to start such a firm. And therefore there is an extremely high concentration of 'top school' credentials at these firms. Just look up the educational backgrounds of the people who run the largest 30 hedge funds and you will see UChicago, HBS and Wharton heavily-represented.
With these two facts in line, it's easy to assess the reasons.
Firstly, a large number of firms are run by traders who used to be in the pits (e.g. DRW Trading Group, Sun Trading, Chopper Trading, SIG). Their founders came from colleges such as Birmingham College. I feel that these guys have an unnatural bias towards hiring people from the top schools, as that is a heuristic for measuring talent. No one likes it but such as is life.
Almost all of the remaining firms are run by people who used to go to your top 10 schools. My firm happens to fall into this category. We are small - if we were a tech firm or mobile app startup with our present capitalization, we'd probably have 50-100 employees by now. Even the most successful firms of our kind barely reach that: FDO Partners has 15. Five Rings Capital has like 25. Hudson River Trading roughly 100.
If you're small, it is very important that everyone fits into your culture. And the easiest way to do this is to hire from your alma mater.
Examples: FDO Partners have their office located in the middle of Harvard's campus, and they are largely a Harvard think-tank. Five Rings Capital's founders came from MIT and it's no coincidence that the school is highly-represented in their externship programs. HRT's founders and first employees came from Harvard and MIT, and a few of them lived on the same dorm floor - odds are against you even if you come from Stanford.
lasymphonie said:
Sorry to jump in (meanrev can answer this much much better), but some things I've heard about the recruiting process and why some schools are targeted - at certain schools, the hit rate is pretty high (a large proportion of those who apply/who are interviewed are offered positions). A lot of the larger banks do a lot of recruiting at my school in order to find more candidates and it's cost effective to do so. At other schools, the hit rate might be a bit lower so it's not cost effective to have a lot of on campus activities to target students.
Another thing is alumni: at the meetings I've been to so far, the speakers have always spoken about the school's network at the firm. I feel like that's mostly marketing, but there's probably an element of truth in that some alums feel passionately about their alma mater and want to hire. Anyway, NYU and Berkeley are both amazing schools! Something I've found helpful is to reach out to alumni to ask for advice and to learn about their experiences, so at either of those schools you should have a large alumni base where you could find people who are willing to help.
The recruitment events I've mostly been to have been IBD/S&T/GCM at large banks, so top quantitative places probably do it differently (and are looking for different skill sets and backgrounds).
I'd echo your view that your alumni are a fantastic resource. I'd also look out for alumni reunion events and see if you can join for the networking opportunity at the reception and after-party.