Quantum Barrier Potential (should be easy)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the tunneling probability of a 10-eV electron through a potential barrier of height 25 eV and width 1 nm using Equation 6-76. The correct application of the equation requires careful attention to unit consistency, particularly when using the mass of the electron in kg and energies in eV. The provided solutions of 4.95 x 10-13 and 0.197 are confirmed, but issues arise when calculators return zero due to low probability values. Converting all parameters to consistent units, preferably using MeV for mass, simplifies calculations and avoids dimensional errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically tunneling phenomena
  • Familiarity with potential barriers and electron energy levels
  • Proficiency in using Equation 6-76 for tunneling probability calculations
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between eV and SI units (Joules)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about quantum tunneling and its applications in semiconductor physics
  • Study the derivation and implications of Equation 6-76 in quantum mechanics
  • Explore unit conversion techniques between eV and Joules for accurate calculations
  • Investigate the behavior of calculators with low probability outputs and numerical stability
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as engineers working with semiconductor devices and tunneling phenomena.

Seda
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 10-eV electron is incident on a potential barrier of height 25eV and width 1 nm.

Use equation 6-76 to calculate the order of magnitude of the probability that the electron will tunnel through the barriers.

Repeat with width .1nm

Homework Equations

Equation 6-76 is:

E = Electron Enegy
V = Potential
a = width

T = 16 (E/V) (1- (E/V) e -2aw

To get w

w = sqrt ( 2m (V-E)) / hbar

where m = mass of electron
hbar= 6.582119 x 10-16 eV*s

The Attempt at a Solution



I know these are the right answers ( they are given)
4.95 x 10-13 and 0.197

Seems to be a simple plug and chug problem, but, However, when I plug the known values into my calculator, the expontential goes to 0. I don't know if my dimensional analysis matched up or not (im using hbar in ev*s though), or maybe my calc is limited in the size of the numbers it can display.

Also, IM not sure what 'order of magnitude' means in the context of the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect you have an error in units when you are finding w:

Seda said:
To get w

w = sqrt ( 2m (V-E)) / hbar

where m = mass of electron
hbar= 6.582119 x 10-16 eV*s

If you use m in kg, and the energies of the electron and barriers in eV, and hbar as you've given, then your units are sqrt(kg)*sqrt(eV)/(eV*s) = sqrt(kg/eV)/s.

This does not reduce to inverse meters, which you'd need to cancel out the width of the barrier in the exponent (assuming you are using the width in meters).

I suggest converting your energies of the electron and barrier to SI units (Joules) and using hbar in SI units (Joules*s).

It doesn't matter when you find the factor before the exponent (because there one uses ratios of energies... units cancel since the conversion is multiplicative)... but it does matter in the exponent.

Also: sometimes when the probabilities are low, calculators can just end up giving you zero... you should write out all your steps if this is happening and do the math with the numbers and the factors of ten separately if possible.
 
physics girl phd said:
If you use m in kg, and the energies of the electron and barriers in eV, and hbar as you've given...

But, if you use the mass of the electron in MeVs, everything's gravy! Why convert all the factors into Joules when you could convert the one remaining factor into eVs?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K