Quantum Entanglement and time travel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the contentious topic of backward time travel, with notable contributions from Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, who suggests that time travel to the past remains a theoretical possibility despite skepticism from many in the scientific community. Participants debate the implications of quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR) on time travel, highlighting concepts such as closed timelike curves and the irreversibility of time. The conversation underscores the complexity of reconciling quantum phenomena with classical notions of time, emphasizing that while GR allows for theoretical models of time travel, practical realizations remain fraught with paradoxes and unresolved questions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) principles, particularly wave function collapse
  • Familiarity with general relativity (GR) and its implications for spacetime
  • Knowledge of closed timelike curves and their theoretical existence in GR
  • Awareness of the Chronology Protection Conjecture and its relevance to time travel
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of closed timelike curves in general relativity
  • Explore the Chronology Protection Conjecture and its critiques
  • Study the relationship between quantum mechanics and time travel theories
  • Investigate the philosophical implications of time travel and causality in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the theoretical underpinnings of time travel and its implications in quantum mechanics and general relativity.

  • #121
I'm not too sure the question really was ever answered. To put it fairly simple, we don't really know. The idea of why it is believed to violate special relativity is that entanglement means that objects that are interacting will react at the same time when something happens to one of the objects no matter how far away the two objects are. But this would mean that some sort of signal would have to be interacting with both objects and would be moving faster than the speed of light. This is where the paradox comes from, if the reaction happens instantly than the signal is moving faster than the speed of light and violated special relativity, unless the signal moves backwards through time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K