Quantum harmonic oscillator problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
17 replies · 7K views
natugnaro
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Is there any way to find [tex]<\varphi_{n}(x)|x|\varphi_{m}(x)|>[/tex] (where phi_n(x) , phi_m(x) are eigenfunction of harmonic oscillator) without doing integral ?


Homework Equations



perhaps orthonormality of hermite polynomials ?

[tex]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}H_{n}(x)H_{m}(x)e^{-x^{2}}dx=\delta_{nm}(Pi)^{1/2}2^{n}n![/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



Actually i need to find <x> from known [tex]\psi(x,t)[/tex].
[tex]<x>=<\psi(x,t)|x|\psi(x,t)|>[/tex]

This gives me a lot of [tex]<\varphi_{n}(x)|x|\varphi_{m}(x)|>[/tex] terms, some of them cancel out (for m=n) ,
but at the end I'm left with three terms thath I have to calculate ([tex]<\varphi_{1}(x)|x|\varphi_{2}(x)>,<\varphi_{2}(x)|x|\varphi_{3}(x)>, <\varphi_{3}(x)|x|\varphi_{1}(x)>[/tex]
and that also looks like a lot of work.

final result is <x>=0

(This is problem from Schaums QM (supplementary prob.))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a recurrence relation, which is satisfied by the Hermite polynomials

[tex]H_{n+1}(x)=2\,x\,H_{n}(x)-2\,n\,H_{n-1}(x)\Rightarrow x\,H_n=\frac{1}{2}\left(H_{n+1}(x)+2\,n\,H_{n-1}(x)\right)[/tex]

Thus you do not have to do the integrals, i.e.

[tex]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}H_{1}(x)\,x\,H_{2}(x)e^{-x^{2}}dx=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}H_{1}(x)\left(\frac{H_{3}(x)+4\,H_{1}(x)}{2}\right)e^{-x^{2}}dx=2\,\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}H_{1}(x)\,H_{1}(x)e^{-x^{2}}dx=4\,\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

Similar expressions hold for the other integrals.
 
natugnaro said:
No, I'm not familiar with Ladder operator method.


ok, it is very powerful and it is used very often in QM (more than just about harm osc). Send me a private message and I'll teach you if you want ;)
 
Thank's Rainbow Child, that is really useful.
Using this recurrence relation for hermite polynomials and [tex]<\varphi_{n}(x)|x|\varphi_{m}(x)>=<\varphi_{m}(x)|x|\varphi_{n}(x)>*[/tex]
I was able to reduce <x> to the form:
[tex]\frac{2}{7}(4\sqrt{\pi}A_{1}A_{2}e^{i\omega t}+4\sqrt{\pi}A_{1}A_{2}e^{-i\omega t}+24\sqrt{\pi}A_{2}A_{3}e^{-i\omega t}+24\sqrt{\pi}A_{2}A_{3}e^{i\omega t})[/tex]
Where An's are normalization constants, but I don't see how this leads to <x>=0 ?
Even if I expand, just Sin(wt) terms will cancel out, but not Cos(wt).
(It is problem 5.15 from Schaum's QM)
 
Last edited:
malawi_glenn said:
\pi and \cdot

I'll keep that in mind.

if you want to learn real QM, try ladder operators (A)

If I don't solve the problem this way, I'll send you a message again.
 
natugnaro said:
Thank's Rainbow Child, that is really useful.
Using this recurrence relation for hermite polynomials and [tex]<\varphi_{n}(x)|x|\varphi_{m}(x)>=<\varphi_{m}(x)|x|\varphi_{n}(x)>*[/tex]
I was able to reduce <x> to the form:
[tex]\frac{2}{7}(4\sqrt{\pi}A_{1}A_{2}e^{i\omega t}+4\sqrt{\pi}A_{1}A_{2}e^{-i\omega t}+24\sqrt{\pi}A_{2}A_{3}e^{-i\omega t}+24\sqrt{\pi}A_{2}A_{3}e^{i\omega t})[/tex]
Where An's are normalization constants, but I don't see how this leads to <x>=0 ?
Even if I expand, just Sin(wt) terms will cancel out, but not Cos(wt).
(It is problem 5.15 from Schaum's QM)

Your answer is correct (up to constants, I didn't carried out the whole calculations). The only case where [itex]<x>=0[/itex] would be if we had eigenfunctions of harmonic oscillator of the form

[tex]\varphi_{n}(x),\varphi_{m}(x)[/tex]

with [tex]n\neq m\pm 1[/tex]

Only in this case the integrals

[tex]\int_{-\infy}^{+\infty}H_n(x)\,x\,H_m(x)\,e^{-x^2}\,d\,x=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)\frac{1}{2}\left(H_{m+1}(x)+2\,m\,H_{m-1}(x)\right)\,d\,x=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)H_{m+1}(x)\,d\,x+m\,\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}H_n(x)\,H_{m-1}(x)\,d\,x[/tex]

would vanish. Thus there must be a typo error in the book! :smile:
 
I didn't get the constants right up there.
I did the thing again and find

[tex]<x>=\frac{2(2+\sqrt{3})}{7}Cos(\omega t)\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}[/tex]


At last I've tried also ladder operators (thanks malawi_glenn).
[tex]x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a+a^{+})[/tex]

then using
[tex]a|k>=\sqrt{k}|k-1>[/tex]
[tex]a^{+}|k>=\sqrt{k+1}|k+1>[/tex]

arrive at
[tex]<n|x|k>=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\sqrt{k}<n|k-1>+\sqrt{k+1}<n|k+1>)[/tex]
where n and k are eigenfunctions of H.O.
From here it's easy, I just use the dot product.
There is a solved problem in Schaums QM for this.

I got the same result for <x> using ladder op. ,that's nice :smile:.
Ok, I'm going to mark this thread as solved even though the solution in the book is <x>=0.
 
how about this: ?

[tex]a|n>=\sqrt{n}|n-1>[/tex]
[tex]a^{\agger}|n>=\sqrt{n+1}|n+1>[/tex]

[tex]<n|x|n> =\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\sqrt{n}<n|n-1>+\sqrt{n+1}<n|n+1>) = 0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
malawi_glenn said:
how about this: ?

[tex]a|n>=\sqrt{n}|n-1>[/tex]
[tex]a^{\agger}|n>=\sqrt{n+1}|n+1>[/tex]

[tex]<n|x|n> =\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\sqrt{n}<n|n-1>+\sqrt{n+1}<n|n+1>) = 0[/tex]

Ok, but I have <1|x|2> and <2|x|3>, so I can't have zero, right ?
 
natugnaro said:
Ok, but I have <1|x|2> and <2|x|3>, so I can't have zero, right ?

no of course not, but the case <n|x|n> = <x> = 0, I thought you said that you did not understand why you did not get it.

The thing you have: <n|x|k> is correct, just plug in your values for n and k and you will get the correct answer.
 
malawi_glenn said:
no of course not, but the case <n|x|n> = <x> = 0, I thought you said that you did not understand why you did not get it.

The thing you have: <n|x|k> is correct, just plug in your values for n and k and you will get the correct answer.

Ok, no problem .
As Rainbow Child said "Thus there must be a typo error in the book!" :smile:
 
natugnaro said:
Ok, no problem .
As Rainbow Child said "Thus there must be a typo error in the book!" :smile:

ok, but <x> always refer to be taken between same two states.

So your tasks was to calculate:

<x> and <1|x|2> and <2|x|3> ?

What does your book give for answers?
 
Here is the text from the book:
The wave function of a harmonic oscillator at time t=0 is
[tex]\psi(x,0)=\sqrt{2}A\phi_{1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}A\phi_{2}+A\phi_{3}[/tex]
Where phi_n is stationary eigenfunction of the harmonic oscillator for the nth state,
and A is normalization constant.
a) compute A.
b) find psi(x,t) for all values of t.
c) calculate the average values of <E> at times t=0, t=Pi/w, t=2Pi/w.
d) find expectation values <x> and <p> for t>=0.


a) done that , got result as in the book
b) done that, got result as in the book
c) skipped that
d) calculated just <x>, <x>=2(2+sqrt(3))/7 * sqrt(h/(2Pi*mw))*Cos(wt)



Solutions from the book:
a) [tex]A=\sqrt{2/7}[/tex]

b) [tex]\psi(x,t)=\sqrt{2/7}(\sqrt{2}\phi_{1}e^{\frac{-3i \omega t}{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\phi_{2}e^{\frac{-5i \omega t}{2}}+\phi_{3}e^{\frac{-7i \omega t}{2}})[/tex]

d) <x>=0 , <p>=0
 
Great, always post the original question in the first post so no confusion aries :)

You now also know how to write p as a combination of a and a(dagger).

shall see if can get the right values for <x>
 
malawi_glenn said:
Great, always post the original question in the first post so no confusion aries :)

Yes, I should have done that :redface: