I don't know much about quantum linear response theory but I am also trying to learn. I found a series of lecture notes by Andrei Tokmakof at MIT. This one seems to be the most relevant.
http://www.mit.edu/~tokmakof/TDQMS/Notes/8._Linear_Response_2-09.pdf.
There are two books referenced on page 20 of the notes linked to in post #2. In the book by Mazenko, section 2.1 is useful. You may also want to check the 4th chapter of Kubo's et al. book <Statistical Physics II>.
It is worth noting that this theory is very "practical", in that it allows you to figure out what you would actually MEASURE in an experiment on a quantum system.
Years ago I e.g. used it to calculate the impedance(in ohms) of a driven system (described by a JC hamiltonian) as a function of applied magnetic field, which in turn allowed me to model a particular experiment to see if it was feasible.
Very useful.
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation.
It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........
This confused me, sorry.
All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong)
I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity?
Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity?
Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question.
Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition:
https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/
As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA