Quantum-mechanical three-state system

  • Thread starter Thread starter thecommexokid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quantum-mechanical three-state system representing a professor, with the states being Bohr, Dirac, and student. A common misconception is addressed regarding the sum of coefficients, clarifying that while amplitudes can exceed 1, probabilities derived from their squares must sum to 1. The amplitude for measuring the professor's "Bohr-ness" is 7/10, resulting in a probability of 49% for finding him in the "Bohr" state. After a measurement confirms him as "Bohr," he transitions to a definite state of being 100% "Bohr," but subsequent measurements may yield different results due to state evolution over time. This highlights the dynamic nature of quantum states post-measurement.
thecommexokid
Messages
68
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Suppose your quantum mechanics professor can be modeled as a three-state quantum system:
|{\rm{professor}}\rangle = \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle + \tfrac{7}{10} |{\rm{Dirac}}\rangle + \tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10} |{\rm{student}}\rangle
The three states have the usual properties: \langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{Dirac}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{student}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Dirac}|\textrm{student}\rangle = 0 and
\langle\textrm{Bohr}|\textrm{Bohr}\rangle = \langle\textrm{Dirac}|\textrm{Dirac}\rangle = \langle\textrm{student}|\textrm{student}\rangle = 1.

(a) If I add up the coefficients, I get: \tfrac{7}{10}+\tfrac{7}{10}+\tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10}=1.54. A classmate says that quantum mechanical probabilities must add up to 1 so |\textrm{professor}\rangle is not a quantum state. What's the flaw in that argument?

(b) If we take a "Bohr-meter" and measure the professor's "Bohr-ness" on any particular day, what do we find? What's the amplitude for the measurement result?

(c) What's the probability of finding |\textrm{professor}\rangle "Bohr"?

(d) Finally, if we measure the professor to be "Bohr", in what state do we leave him? After we measure him to be "Bohr", what happens if we immediately ask again whether he's "Bohr"?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I think the answers are; but I'm not currently in a setting where I can ask anybody if I have them right/complete. I'd just like it if somebody could look over my work and/or provide additional insight I may be missing here.

(a) There's no rule about quantum mechanical amplitudes having to add up to anything — in fact, in general amplitudes can be imaginary, in which case there's no way they'd add up to 1. Quantum mechanical probabilities, equal to the square of the amplitudes, must sum to 1, and indeed they do here:
\left( \tfrac{7}{10} \right)^2 + \left( \tfrac{7}{10} \right)^2 + \left( \tfrac{\sqrt{2}}{10} \right)^2 = \tfrac{49}{100} + \tfrac{49}{100} + \tfrac{2}{100} = 1.

(b) and (c) The amplitude to measure the professor to be "Bohr" is \frac{7}{10}. However, after a measurement with the "Bohr-meter", we will only find him either to be 100% Bohr or 0% Bohr: \frac{49}{100} of the time we will measure him to be "Bohr", and \frac{51}{100} of the time, we will not.

(d) Immediately after measuring the professor to be "Bohr", he is no longer in his original state. Instead he is in the state
|{\rm{professor}}\rangle = 1|{\rm{Bohr}}\rangle + 0|{\rm{Dirac}}\rangle + 0|{\rm{student}}\rangle .
So if we measure him again immediately, we will find him to be "Bohr". However, over time his state will evolve such that if we measure him again after some time has passed, it is no longer certain whether he will be "Bohr".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top