Quantum Mechanics and Observables

quantumfoam
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
Hi guys! I have one question! I know that in quantum mechanics, observables must be in the form of operators. However, does that mean that all observables are quantized in quantum mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quantumfoam said:
Hi guys! I have one question! I know that in quantum mechanics, observables must be in the form of operators. However, does that mean that all observables are quantized in quantum mechanics?

No. Operators can have continuous spectrum, so the observables may by continuous. This is the case of energy of a free particle for example.
 
Oh okay! So if the particle was in a potential then the energy of the particle would be quantized?
 
quantumfoam said:
Oh okay! So if the particle was in a potential then the energy of the particle would be quantized?

That's true for potentials that are not bounded from above (e.g. the harmonic oscillator potential). Some potentials, like that of an electron interacting with a proton, result in a set of quantized bound states with negative energy and a continuum of unbound "scattering states" with positive energy.
 
Last edited:
I see.(: Thanks guys!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top