B Quantum mechanics defies causal order

kurt101
Messages
285
Reaction score
35
I came across this article at physicsworld.com which has the headline "Quantum mechanics defies causal order, experiment confirms".
https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-mechanics-defies-causal-order-experiment-confirms/

The actual experiment is described here:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04302

I had a difficult time understanding the experiment and the implications of this experiment. Is it novel in any way? Can anyone shed light on what the headline is implying?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kurt101 said:
The actual experiment is described here:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04302

I had a difficult time understanding the experiment and the implications of this experiment. Is it novel in any way? Can anyone shed light on what the headline is implying?

Not sure I can add anything to your understanding of this paper from a top team. Sure, it's an improvement over some similar prior versions of the experiment. That we are even reading about experiments like this is nothing short of amazing.

The key thing is that this result is fully consistent with standard QM. There is no known causal order in many quantum operations/setups. There has been speculation that a deeper theory (than current QM) might point out such causal order. Experiments such as this tend to show that no such theory exists.
 
They implemented the operation "if C then A*B else B*A", where C is a qubit and A,B are unitary operations on a second qubit. For some reason I can't fathom they interpreted this as "defying causal order". To my eyes there's a very clear causal order. First the setup performs "if C then A else B", then it performs "if C then B else A". That's the order.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and DrChinese
I am also interested in this.. I read about it before but didn't fully grasp it.
Any more insights about this experiment?
What does it mean for quantum computing?
And what are possible applications?
 
  • Like
Likes DrChinese
StevieTNZ said:
There is this video, , from the "Brukner Group" at www.quantum.at (https://www.quantumfoundations.org/index.html check out links at the top of the latest publications list)


Wow, they managed to "dumb it down" so I can almost understand it! Thanks for the link, I definitely recommend it. Although the 3:49 video took me a bit longer as I had to stop and replay a few sections a couple of times. LOL.

The video mentions this key paper by Chiribella. Its result demonstrates that the result of an experiment to discriminate causal order produces results inconsistent with the predictions of QM. (Somewhat analogous to Bell in that respect.) So the OP's citation is the latest/greatest implementation of this idea.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.5154

Accepting this result is another way of saying that nature is not deterministic. I doubt this will change anyone's favorite interpretation, but this is all very impressive stuff.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top